The eBay Song | Credit Card | Web Advertising | Cash Advance | Loans
c2d and ram [Archive] - PCMech Forums

PDA

View Full Version : c2d and ram


marine63
07-20-2007, 08:31 AM
"DDR2 memory modules

Unlike the previous Pentium 4 and Pentium D design, the Core 2 technology sees a greater benefit from memory running synchronously with the Front Side Bus (FSB). This means that for the Conroe CPUs with FSB of 1066 MT/s, the ideal memory speed is PC2-4200. In some configurations, using PC2-5300 can actually decrease performance. Only when going to PC2-6400 is there a significant performance increase. While expensive DDR2 memory models with tighter timings do improve performance, the difference in real world games and applications is negligible."
-from wiki

... really? 677mhz could decrease performance??


"On jobs requiring large amounts of memory access, the quad-core Core 2 processors can benefit significantly [38]from using PC2-8500 memory, which runs exactly twice as fast as the FSB; this is not an officially supported configuration, but a number of motherboards offer it."
... really? >.<

marine63
07-21-2007, 09:21 PM
D: someone answer me D:

blue60007
07-21-2007, 11:42 PM
Where'd you read that at? Do you have a link to the whole article? I'd like to read the rest of the set up and testing procedures...

I don't think the memory speed will make a noticable difference (either way) in every day usage. Sure benchmarks might show differences either way but you don't use benchmarks to surf the web or play games.

marine63
07-22-2007, 12:37 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_2_duo#DDR2_memory_modules wiki
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=472 wiki's source
i still want to know that im getting my money's worth -.-

blue60007
07-22-2007, 01:39 AM
Corsair's DDR2-533 has 4-4-4-12 timings and the DDR2-667 has 5-5-5-15. Some of the tests the DDR2-667 comes out ahead. Some the DDR2-667 seems to be way behind which is wierd and I can't explain that. The Madshrimp's article does make the point that these are synthetic benchmarks and won't necessarily translate into real life performance.

I'd stick with DDR2-667 with the 1066 FSB C2D's and I would think DDR2-800 would be a logical step up for 1333 FSB C2D's (although DDR2-667 would work fine).

I've usually seen DDR2-667 cheaper than DDR2-533 (only a few bucks), and memory's so cheap now DRR2-800 isn't a whole lot more than DDR2-667.