View Full Version : overkill
topnode
04-29-2002, 09:25 AM
Just curious.
What is the performance difference between a 32MB GeForce2 MX200 (my card) and those GeForce4 Ti4600s in layman's terms?
why do some people go to great lengths just to eek the last 2 fps out of their systems? :)
Thanks! :D
topnode
04-29-2002, 09:54 AM
To answer my own post:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q2/020418/vgacharts-01.html
to
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q2/020418/vgacharts-05.html
Therefore the Ti4600 is 3 to 5 times faster than my pitiful MX200! :(
Tiretool
04-29-2002, 10:02 AM
Yes, it's quite a night and day difference.
Simply put, the 4600 puts any GeForce2 (even the Ultra) to shame. But you've got to have deep pockets to afford one right now.
topnode
05-02-2002, 04:40 AM
kick me by the foot Tiretool. I just realized I deserve it... :D
Blakhart
05-02-2002, 11:19 AM
Ha!
whr2206
05-02-2002, 07:50 PM
I replaced my Voodoo 3 with an ati 7500, wasnt like night and day, but the picture quality was better, and there was a big speed difference....but I wasnt blown out of my seat or anything, but a 7500 isnt a geforce 4 either.....
smokealotapotimus
05-03-2002, 03:53 AM
hehe, the Radeon 7500 is certainly no GF4... more like a sunset and dawn difference........ or something................. shutup........
.......... what are you looking at!?
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.