ssahl
06-04-2002, 02:00 AM
I have a dual boot set up with Win98 on the C: drive & Win2k on drive d:
Win2k has big problems and I would like to format the D: drive and then reinstall it (XP) I still want to use Win98 and I dont want anything to mess that up, but since it was there before I put Win2k on it cant I just go ahead and do that (format the D: drive) I know I should edit the boot.ini file, but I was thinking I would rather delete it along with some other files on the C: drive that are there because of Win2k. Here are the names of some of those files, and they are all in C:\ part of the drive. Some of these I'm not sure if I can delete or not without causing problems, if there's one of these files in the list I should not delete or edit please someone tell me.
System.1st
ntdetect.com
jswx.log
sysparse.reg
sysparse.log
perform.log
Cldma.log
Boot.ini
ntldr
Suhdlog.dat
txtsetup.sif
Detlog.txt
Bootlog.txt
Boot.bak
Bootsect.dos
Bootlog.prv
drives C: & D: are both on the same harddrive along with E: (which has no OS on it) and all are partitioned in FAT32 if I do this will I be able to install WinXP (after formating d: to NTFS)
and have it work like it should with a dual boot setup? I'm not sure but I know if there is no ntldr file I will not be able to boot up and it will tell me that it's missing, but this file was never needed before I put Win2k on there, I always thought that this message was because of the ntdetect.com file that is also on the C:\ drive, but I have never tested that theory out. I have formated the second drive of a dual boot setup before and reinstalled it, but aside from editing the boot.ini file I left all files alone on the C:\ drive.
Since I have first installed Win98 I have way more files then the original 5 or 6 I started with in this directory, after so long I have a hard time remembering where each file came from, what it does and so forth. One last bit of info, Win98 has had lots of added software/use/changes but the Win2k had had very few programs added with very little changes and almost no use.
I have nothing at all against Win2k at all, it's just I now know Win98 to good to just stop using it. If what I want to do will in fact work ok I will probable install it back on the system along with XP.
Win2k has big problems and I would like to format the D: drive and then reinstall it (XP) I still want to use Win98 and I dont want anything to mess that up, but since it was there before I put Win2k on it cant I just go ahead and do that (format the D: drive) I know I should edit the boot.ini file, but I was thinking I would rather delete it along with some other files on the C: drive that are there because of Win2k. Here are the names of some of those files, and they are all in C:\ part of the drive. Some of these I'm not sure if I can delete or not without causing problems, if there's one of these files in the list I should not delete or edit please someone tell me.
System.1st
ntdetect.com
jswx.log
sysparse.reg
sysparse.log
perform.log
Cldma.log
Boot.ini
ntldr
Suhdlog.dat
txtsetup.sif
Detlog.txt
Bootlog.txt
Boot.bak
Bootsect.dos
Bootlog.prv
drives C: & D: are both on the same harddrive along with E: (which has no OS on it) and all are partitioned in FAT32 if I do this will I be able to install WinXP (after formating d: to NTFS)
and have it work like it should with a dual boot setup? I'm not sure but I know if there is no ntldr file I will not be able to boot up and it will tell me that it's missing, but this file was never needed before I put Win2k on there, I always thought that this message was because of the ntdetect.com file that is also on the C:\ drive, but I have never tested that theory out. I have formated the second drive of a dual boot setup before and reinstalled it, but aside from editing the boot.ini file I left all files alone on the C:\ drive.
Since I have first installed Win98 I have way more files then the original 5 or 6 I started with in this directory, after so long I have a hard time remembering where each file came from, what it does and so forth. One last bit of info, Win98 has had lots of added software/use/changes but the Win2k had had very few programs added with very little changes and almost no use.
I have nothing at all against Win2k at all, it's just I now know Win98 to good to just stop using it. If what I want to do will in fact work ok I will probable install it back on the system along with XP.