View Full Version : which is better
N2OCooled
01-18-2003, 07:45 PM
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduct.asp?description=14-102-258
or
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?description=14-128-142
Nuclear Krusader
01-18-2003, 07:48 PM
Which one is better for what?
They are both completely different things.
edge345
01-18-2003, 07:52 PM
ATI OEM RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI is the better card....
N2OCooled
01-18-2003, 08:00 PM
What I mean is whick card has better graphics for gaming. Which 1 is faster.
Nuclear Krusader
01-18-2003, 08:08 PM
It's very strange. The first time I clicked on your links they displayed an OEM version of Win XP Home and some video capture card. Hence my question.
Now they are displaying a GF4 MX video card, which is crap; and a Radeon 9500 which is the VC you really want to buy.
LordofEchoSide
01-18-2003, 08:56 PM
I see a
1. ATI RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI BULK
2.GAINWARD/CARDEXPERT GeForce 4, 8X AGP. Ti 4200, 3.3ns, Power Pack Golden Sample, BGA 128MB DDR,
:confused: I remember linking someone to some products and they came out wrong
Jeradln82
01-18-2003, 09:22 PM
Save $19 and go with the better card. All the articles and reviews that I've read show the ATI 9500pro to be the better card (which is why i bought it)
Personally I'm really happy with it, its a great card. Of course the ATI 8500 would of been and big upgrade from my GF2 pro...lol.
The ATI is the better performer in most cases. Good price on it too. ;)
Blakhart
01-18-2003, 09:28 PM
If you can save a little more, the 9700 can't be beat.
Bushtree
01-18-2003, 09:47 PM
go for the ATI
anyting with MX in it is a cheap budget version of the real thing.
ILLPHIL
01-18-2003, 11:55 PM
9700 or 9700 pro?
Nuclear Krusader
01-18-2003, 11:58 PM
Pro.
ILLPHIL
01-19-2003, 12:02 AM
ok thanks, ill check price difference between the 9700 pro and the Asus Ti9200
ILLPHIL
01-19-2003, 12:06 AM
Im not sure I am able to pay twice as much for a video card at the moment, theres nothing wrong with an Asus ti4200 is there?
cant see an mx in there anywhere
A Ti4200 is an excellent gaming card for the money.
pam123
01-19-2003, 05:55 PM
Consult your wallet.
If you can afford the best, go for it ($ 200 - $400) !
If not, get the most future proof card the budget can afford.
N2OCooled
01-20-2003, 10:36 AM
My budget is under 200. both those cards cost the same on newegg.com. HOw much is the fx card going to be when it actually comes out. Are those two cards about the same performance , just another debate like the intel and amd issue?
Fastfly
01-20-2003, 10:42 AM
Its coming out at $399.99.
Lord Prism
01-20-2003, 07:41 PM
VOte for the Gainward.
Good Luck,
Jeradln82
01-20-2003, 08:37 PM
OEM 9500pro is $172 at mwave.com
1 big vote for ATI 9500 pro! hehehe :D
Texuspete00
01-23-2003, 11:32 AM
ATI 9500 pro is better than the 4200. It is close to the 4600 with reg settings, faster with AA and aniso and is hence more future proof. I think most suggesting the GF4 just prefer Nvidia for drivers or whatever. As far as faster card, def. 9500 pro
Did Nuclear say the GF4 was crap...wait a second I thought GeForce's were very good cards, and why do you say anything with MX in is it a cheap replacement...I was in here couple of weeks ago...and I was aking what card I should get and plenty of ppl said GF4, isnt it a good card?
pam123
01-23-2003, 01:46 PM
Gforce cards come in two varities.
Those reading 4 Ti 200, 4Ti 400, and 4Ti 600 are all good cards.
Those reading Gforce 4 MX, and other cards in that line, are aimed at the budget market and are, basically, retooled Gforce2 cards. That means they aren't up to speed for current games and aren't going to cut it for future ones. We're talking technology that is now 3 generations out of date.
Why Nvidia did this I don't know. It's misleading to say the least.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.