Mortgage Calculator | Remortgages | Loans | MPAA | Loans
Appeasers [Archive] - PCMech Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Appeasers


Mac Medic
03-23-2003, 09:10 PM
Appeasers

The terms of the cease-fire were quite simple, get out of Kuwait, disband your military machine, destroy your weapons of mass instruction, and stop torturing and murdering your citizenry. He agreed to these terms in full. For the last 12 years he has systematically violated the terms of the cease-fire. Twelve years we have given him, twelve years we have waited for him to come into compliance, how much longer would you have us wait?. Should we allow him 15 years perhaps 20 years to comply with the terms of the cease-fire, hypothetically how long should we have given Adolph Hitler? The appeasers of this nation and the world, including the United Nations have done nothing but weaken their position, they have shown that a United Nations resolution can be ignored for twelve years before being acted upon. Twelve years for a rogue nation to continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, twelve years of opportunity to use those weapons on neighboring nations while the U.N. sits idly by waiting peacefully for them to come into compliance. Twelve years for countries such as France Germany and Russia to violate the U.N. sanctions by doing business with this nation, by providing them with materials to make weapons in order to fight the United States of America. In my opinion twelve years was too long, many Iraqi citizens have sacrificed their lives in this twelve years when we should've acted decisively in 1991. What good is a resolution that includes the threat of force if you have no intention of using force? It's just an idle threat that dictators like Saddam Hussein believe they can ignore. I think after twelve years it's time we sent a message, if you violate international law expect to pay the price. And yet this day after these heathens capture torture and murder American troops, and then parade their bodies publicly while celebrating, this day when coalition forces capture a chemical weapons factory, this day when evidence of the Russians sending scientists and technicians to Iraq to show them how to use GPS jamming equipment to repell the coalition forces has come to light, this day there are still people in this country and around the world who think we should appease this regime. That I find to be offensive to freedom loving people.

Paul Victorey
03-23-2003, 10:12 PM
Actually, the only term of the ceasefire he violated was the illegal removal of weapons inspectors in 1997. The terms of UN Resolution 687 were:

* UN creates a border between Iraq and Kuwait.
* UN creates a DMZ and places observers there.
* UN weapons inspectors may search for and destroy biochem and nuclear weapons.
* Iraq agrees not to make any additional chem/bio weapons or import nuclear material.
* Iraq agrees to declare all of its existing stockpiles.
* Iraq agrees to not develop ballistic missile technology with ranges in excess of 150 km.
* Iraq agrees to pay the costs of the 1991 war.
* Iraq agrees to honor its foreign debts.
* Iraq allows Red Cross presence.
* Iraq agrees not to sponsor terrorism.

Truly, the only one which can be proven to have been broken was the weapons inspections. They have yet to find concrete evidence that Iraq has developed biochem weapons after 1991, or that it did not destroy existing biochem weapons. They thought they had evidence Iraq was going after nukes, but those documents turned out to have been forgeries.

Mac Medic
03-23-2003, 10:20 PM
So he doesnt have chemical weapons factories? and he doesnt sponsor terrorism? And he hasnt been firing weapons with a longer range than 150km? and he paid the cost of the 1991 war? and he daclared all his stockpiles? And he recognizes the Kuwait border? Dude, face reality.

The cease fire agreement was signed March 3rd 1991, 687 was adopted April 3rd 1991. (this may be innacurate as accounts vary)

On April 3, 1991, Security Council Resolution 687 established a program to identify and dismantle Iraq's programs to develop WMD and missiles capable of delivering the weapons at great distances. The U.N. Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency were charged with ensuring compliance with this resolution through inspections in Iraq. Over the course of the next seven years, the Iraqi regime obstructed and deceived U.N. weapons inspectors. The inspectors uncovered WMD stockpiles and development and production facilities, despite the regime's claims it had no such programs. On November 11, 1998, following Iraq's announcement that it was prohibiting all UNSCOM inspections, weapons inspections in Iraq ceased. Under increasing international pressure, Iraq agreed to allow inspectors MI access, but then resumed obstructing their operations. The United Nations withdrew the inspectors on December 15, 1998. One day later, U.S. and British military forces launched Operation Desert Fox -- a three-day series of air strikes aimed at destroying suspected WMD facilities. Over the next four years, Iraq refused to admit weapons inspectors under the terms set forth by the Security Council.

Mac Medic
03-23-2003, 10:34 PM
Joint Resolution to Authorize the use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in 1998 Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in "material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations" and urged the president "to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations" (Public Law 105-235);

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolutions of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001 underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949;

Whereas Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) has authorized the president "to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677";

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1)," that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and "constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region," and that Congress, "supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688";


Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to "work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge" posed by Iraq and to "work for the necessary resolutions," while also making clear that "the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable";

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the president to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the president and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the president has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40);

and Whereas it is in the national security of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region;

Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. This joint resolution may be cited as the "Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq".

Mac Medic
03-23-2003, 10:42 PM
Letter to Congressional Leaders on the Situation in the Persian Gulf
May 17, 1991
Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

On March 19, 1991, I reported to you, consistent with the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102 - 1), on the successful conduct of military operations aimed at the liberation of Kuwait. Since that time, the United Nations Security Council has adopted Resolution 687, which set forth the preconditions for a formal cease-fire. Iraq has accepted those terms, and the cease-fire and withdrawal of coalition forces from southern Iraq have been concluded. The Iraqi repression of the Kurdish people has, however, necessitated a limited introduction of U.S. forces into northern Iraq for emergency relief purposes. I am reporting these matters to you as part of our continuing effort to keep the Congress fully informed on these developments.

Resolution 687 required, as a precondition for a formal cease-fire, that Iraq officially notify the United Nations of its acceptance of the provisions of the resolution. These provisions included: (1) respect for the international boundary as agreed between Iraq and Kuwait in 1963, which the Security Council guaranteed; (2) the creation of a demilitarized zone along the Iraq-Kuwait border and the deployment of a U.N. observer unit into that zone; (3) the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless of all chemical and biological weapons, ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometers, and nuclear-weapons-usable material, together with facilities related to them, and international supervision and inspection to verify compliance; (4) the creation of a fund, drawn from future Iraqi oil revenues, to pay compensation for losses caused by the Iraqi invasion and occupation of Kuwait; (5) the continuation of the embargo of all exports of arms to Iraq; (6) the phased relaxation of certain other aspects of the U.N. sanctions against Iraq as Iraq complies with its obligations under the resolution; and (7) the renunciation by Iraq of support for international terrorism.

Iraq officially accepted those terms on April 6, and a formal cease-fire has gone into effect. Accordingly, United States Armed Forces deployed in southern Iraq began withdrawing as U.N. peacekeeping personnel deployed into the zone, and this withdrawal was completed on May 9. The United States has been assisting the U.N. Secretary General in his efforts to implement the other provisions of Resolution 687, particularly with respect to boundary demarcation, compensation, and weapons of mass destruction.

During this same period, however, Iraqi forces engaged in a campaign of brutal repression of internal opposition, with the result that many hundreds of thousands of civilians fled their homes in search of safety in the regions along the Turkish and Iranian borders. In response to this situation, on April 5 the Security Council adopted Resolution 688, which insisted that Iraq cease its repression and allow immediate access by international humanitarian organizations, and appealed to all Member States to assist in these humanitarian relief efforts.

I immediately ordered United States Armed Forces to begin air-dropping large amounts of food and other essential items to these refugees. However, it soon became clear that even this massive effort would not be enough to deal with the desperate plight of the hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children stranded and suffering in these mountainous areas. Accordingly, on April 16 I directed United States Armed Forces to begin to establish immediately several temporary encampments in northern Iraq where geographical conditions would be more suitable for relief efforts. United States, British, and French forces are providing security for these encampments.

This effort is not intended as a permanent solution to the plight of the Iraqi Kurds. It is a humanitarian measure designed to save lives, consistent with Resolution 688. It is also not an attempt to intervene militarily into the internal affairs of Iraq or to impair its territorial integrity. We intend to turn over the administration and security for these temporary sites as soon as possible to the United Nations (a process that has already begun), and to complete our total withdrawal from Iraq. Our long-term objective remains the same: for Iraqi Kurds, and indeed for all Iraqi refugees and displaced persons, to return home and to live in peace, free from repression.

I am grateful for the support that the Congress has given, and I look forward to continued cooperation in meeting these urgent humanitarian goals.

Sincerely,

George Bush

Note: Identical letters were sent to Thomas S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Robert C. Byrd, President pro tempore of the Senate.