PDA

View Full Version : Msi Ti4200 Vs Ati 9200


BUGNUT
08-16-2003, 09:45 AM
I'm looking to buy one of these 128mb cards. The MSI should be clocked at 257mhz memory and 250mhz core. I can't find the specs for the ATI 9200. Does anyone have the specs? Which one would you choose?

Regards

Bugnut

wickedstyle
08-16-2003, 10:57 AM
I would choose the MSI TI4200 in my own experiance I love the way they perform and they are very popular as well.

Surge1243
08-16-2003, 11:17 AM
I'd go with a the Ti4200 as well. My card performed very well until it died...but that's not that card's fault, just the manufacturer (*cough* avoid PNY *cough*)

oleblue73
08-16-2003, 11:37 AM
I've read some poor reviews of the 9200. I'd go with the ti4200, or better yet, for the same price I'd get a Radeon 9600pro and have DX9 functionality. Just my opinion though.

HAL9000
08-16-2003, 12:27 PM
I have to agree... why are you comparing those two cards when the 9200 is considerably cheaper. Go with a 9600 for a better comparison price wise, then in my opinion, go with the 9600 for better performance.

BUGNUT
08-16-2003, 01:53 PM
So all agree that the 9600 is the better card. My local PC store has a few 9500 and 9500 Pro in stock as well as the 9600 and 9600 Pro. What would your choice be now?

Regards

Bugnut

bell_kicks
08-16-2003, 02:00 PM
9600 pro for the beef, but you'll want to get a new motherboard to make full use of that agp 8x coz a k7s5a dnt support it!!

BUGNUT
08-16-2003, 04:30 PM
It seems I always finish last with this K7S5A.

Bugnut

Surge1243
08-16-2003, 04:39 PM
I'd go with a 9500 over a 9600 if the choice came down to that. Not only is the 9500 faster than the 9600, it's possible to mod a 9500 non-pro into a 9700. I'm not saying go for the 9500 just because of that, but that is something to consider.

oleblue73
08-16-2003, 05:21 PM
The 9500's outperform the 9600's, but the 9600's run cooler and use less juice and they are also very overclocking friendly, even with stock cooling.

Force Flow
08-16-2003, 10:14 PM
I've been told that the 9500 supports DX9, while the Ti4200 would not.

Blakhart
08-17-2003, 03:37 AM
True, if you want dx9 then the 95/600 would be a good call. If you only do dx8 or lower games/apps, then the 4200 is the power.

Spyda
08-17-2003, 08:06 PM
the Ti4200 has so much graphics power, its a real diamond in the sea of sh*te that is the graphics cards of now

mjkovis
08-17-2003, 08:28 PM
Originally posted by bell_kicks
9600 pro for the beef, but you'll want to get a new motherboard to make full use of that agp 8x coz a k7s5a dnt support it!!

You would also have to change the mobo for the Ti4200. That card is also AGP 8x. That is if you want it to work to its full extent. It is 4x compatable though.

mjkovis
08-17-2003, 08:29 PM
Oops, forgot to add that you should go with the MSI Ti4200. Great card! Not a big fan of the Radeon's.

glc
08-20-2003, 12:43 PM
Depends on your priority - if gaming is your thing, get the 4200, if good graphics is, get a Radeon of some sort. The ATI has a better 2D display.

Furius92
08-20-2003, 12:54 PM
You won't even notice a difference with AGP 8x compared to 4x. Don't waste money on upgrading a motherboard just to use AGP 8x. Supposedly, even the bandwith of 4x isn't used fully, and benchmarks and tests show that using AGP 8x with the same card doesn't offer any noticable benefit compared to 4x.

reboot
08-20-2003, 02:00 PM
BTW, the newer Ti4200's <b>are</b> 8x AGP. I have one :D

Spyda
08-20-2003, 03:40 PM
The big clue is in the name

Ti4200 8x

its always nice to if you can though :)