PDA

View Full Version : Gigabyte vs. Sapphire (9600 Pro)


BustaRomeo
12-30-2003, 04:35 AM
No talk, just vote. I want the card pumping out the best frame rates and doesn't need extra cooling in order to do so.

BustaRomeo
01-01-2004, 04:47 AM
Does anyone know a site that gives 3dmark '03 results on both these cards?

Panama Red
01-01-2004, 12:15 PM
I voted Sapphire, but get the XT instead. Faster clock speeds and supports ATI's Overdrive incorporated in Catalyst 3.10 drivers.

Nuclear Krusader
01-01-2004, 09:38 PM
Sapphire all the way. Excellent craftsmanship, outstanding performance.

BustaRomeo
01-02-2004, 03:48 AM
The shop I'm buying from doesn't have the XT, is the PRO still better than Gigabyte's offering?

glc
01-02-2004, 08:23 AM
I don't see a problem with Gigabyte - ATI maintains pretty high standards for their cardmakers, unlike Nvidia.

ComPman
01-03-2004, 12:12 PM
Gigabyte they are useless, i sent in a MB for an RMA and it came back after freg 20 days:mad:

Nuclear Krusader
01-03-2004, 09:26 PM
Originally posted by BustaRomeo
The shop I'm buying from doesn't have the XT, is the PRO still better than Gigabyte's offering?
Both the Gigabyte and the Sapphire you list are Pro versions.

Go with Sapphire.

ComPman
01-04-2004, 01:55 PM
Is 9600 better the Gefroce 4 ti 4200

Alaron
01-04-2004, 06:20 PM
Originally posted by ComPman
Is 9600 better the Gefroce 4 ti 4200

Yes. :cool:

TwoRails
01-04-2004, 06:24 PM
Originally posted by BustaRomeo
No talk, just vote... " "