NAV 2003 = outdated?

[jimmyrules712]

would it be foolish to use norton anti virus 2003 when they now have 2004 out? or will 2003 work just fine?

[dave computer]

it would work fine as long as you keep the virus definitions up to date.

[Panama Red]

dave is right, jimmy. I had purchased a copy of NAV back in May, 2003 version, but didn't install it til I built this new system in November. It's good for 1 year no matter when the 1 year clock starts tickin'. It'll update to all the current standards.

[TwoRails]

I'm still running 2003 on my boxes

[glc]

2003 works just fine, but there's issues with 2004 - I'd recommend you stick with 2003 for now.

[casey]

GLC, what's wrong with NAV 2004 ?, I have it running on 4 systems now and the one thing I have noticed is that my PC's are much slower than with NAV 2003. On these 4 PC's Intel 815's with Tualatin 1.3/1.4 Celey's 384 - 512 ram 2004 has added 30 seconds to bootup time !! On 5 of my other PC's (same specs) I have changed over to AVG 7 Professional because of these speed issues.

[CrazyMike]

Hey, I'm still running NAV 2002

[Carpedebass]

I've been running NAV 2002 since it hit the shelves. It has not failed me.

[ThePoor]

nav 2004 uses alot of memory. it slows the system abit.. and now still using nav03..

[batiso]

runs just fine NAV2003 with viral updates