|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Building a pc...suggestions please
Hello everyone, I'm going to be building a new pc soon, my first time doing so, and was wondering if anyone could give me some suggestions. I've got a basic list of what I want, but any suggestions on anything I have down would be nice. The only thing I really have preferance over is the case, and that's just because the xion goes with my whole gaming name. I'm building the pc mainly for gaming. Thanks.
Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811208008 (A must almost) PSU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817103931 (unsure, suggestions welcome) Mobo: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131530 (unsure again, but I'm not worried about having 2 video cards) CPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103544 (I think) HDD: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822116144 or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822116145 if I can afford it. RAM: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820145310 (Just wanting good ram that's 1gig sticks, and 2 of them) Sound Card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16829102179 Video Card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814135184 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
Anandtech puts put some good guides like this one: http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=2659
I would probably start there. Your memory and hard drive choices aren't compatible with the motherboard you've selected. Last edited by popgoesthweasel; 01-27-2006 at 01:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Statesboro, Ga
Posts: 265
|
i would go with a lesser cpu. like either the 3800 and save your self 332$ or the 4200 and save 265$. or go single core and save hella more. (3700+ or 4000+ single cores)
vid card. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130256 Sound card: the sound on your mobo should get you by unless you are a sound nut. psu. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817103464 should be more than enough and damn good Company. ram: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227210 if you hurry there is a 45$ mail in rebate on it. HD: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822136012 hope this helps. i dont know if money is an issue, but that should save you a good chunck of change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
You can't use SCSI drives without buying a SCSI controller card, which is expensive.
You need unbuffered non-ECC RAM, not what you have chosen now. I'd wait on the sound card to see if the onboard sound is good enough for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
Ok I threw together a wishlist over at Newegg.
http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/...itle=recommend Now for why. The motherboard is a solid board with bling it will look good in your case with the addition of a couple UV lights. There is also a good forum at dfi-street.com in case you run into specific problems with this board. The video card is from a good manufacturer that offers a lifetime warranty on that product. The psu is a good psu and comes with high marks from those over at DFI Street. Ditto the ram. The proceesor is a step down but not by much. I'd go with a single core processor in a gaming machine and eliminate the any potential headache of incompitibilities between your processor and the games you want to play. Since you didn't really blink at the cost of an SCSI hard drive , I figured go for cutting edge. The latest and greatest WD Raptor. There are other more value oriented choices however. I didn't include a sound card, but on board has never cut it for me. YMMV. Last edited by popgoesthweasel; 01-27-2006 at 02:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
Link doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
IF there is more dollars in the budget, YOu could go with a top of the line single core processor from AMD.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103558 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Ok thanks for all of the info. Most of that I didn't pay too much attention too...and obviously made some mistakes. I have a probably stupid question though...what's the difference between amd64, 64fx, and x2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
AMD Athlon 64-bit processors are your basic 64-bit processors. Socket 754 is the cheaper line and only supports single-channel memory. Socket 939 is the general line, supporting dual-channel. You probably want to stay away from Socket 754. X2 processors are dual-core; they have two processors in one package. FX processors are the top of the line, aimed at the crowd that have to have the latest, fastest, and most expensive processors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
That's kinda what I had thought, but I didn't want to just assume and be wrong. Ok...another question. Someone replied that dual core would be bad for games...is that true? If so that helps what processor I want from those suggested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
Dual-core processors aren't "bad" for games, but current games do not take advantage of dual cores. Thus, a fast single-core may be better for gaming than a dual-core processor with two slower cores. What dual cores allows you to do is more than one thing at once, for example if you play a game and encode MP3s at the same time.
While games don't take advantage of dual cores, Windows itself will and thus it may not be a bad idea to get a dual-core processor if you are doing several things at once when you aren't gaming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
ram http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227210
Harddrive http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822136012 processor http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103529 video card http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130256 mobo http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131530 http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16813136159 Unsure which of these is really better. I think the only difference is the 2 x16 slots over a few regular pci slots. case http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811208008 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Statesboro, Ga
Posts: 265
|
the only reason as of now that you would need two pci x16 would be for sli. Which i dont think you want to do by reading your previous posts. i would go with the Asus mobo myself.
I like your list you should be able to get by with 1gig of ram as opposed to 2. Could save you some more cash if your looking to save. But the 2gigs will benifit you in some games and things. what is the primary function of this computer going to be? playing games i would asume. as for that PSU i would get a case that doesn't come with one and get the enermax i suggested previously. good luck with the build. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Thanks
The case is going to stay for sure. I go by Xion on everything so the name case fits me perfect. But I could always change psu's easily which is something I'm still probably going to do. Thanks everyone for the help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,509
|
The Antec TPII 550 in your first post is fine. It is one of the best on the market. The Enermax that was posted would probably be OK and the OCZ in the wishlist is a server PSU and would be overkill for your setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Oh duh one more question...again :P...I will also need to buy a windows xp cd to install it right? I'm assuming that doesn't come with any of the stuff I purchased. Or is there a windows 64 or something that I'd need to buy instead?
Last edited by Xion_Xiathyne; 01-28-2006 at 12:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Yeah, you'll need to get a copy of Windows. Win XP Home OEM should work fine, unless you need the extra networking features of Pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Ok thanks. Another question that could save me around $200. How big of a difference is an 8mb cache from a 16mb cache in a harddrive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
I see you picked out that 150GB raptor. Personally, I don't think that's worth $200. I would get a 7200 rpm drive with a 16MB cache. They perform pretty close to the smaller Raptors... Besides, you could get twice as much space for half as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
I see that you've chasen a single core processor, but I wish to illumunate my dual core comment. From my expereince with dual core and newer games I have found no problems that could be attributed to the dual core proceesor; by newer games I mean COD2 and AoE3. On a game like Madden 2006, I get speed ups that are solved by setting the processor affinity for the program.
Heres a link to another forum which discusses the issue, http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=983781 As far as the Raptor hard drive, the 10,000 rpm and the 16MB cache make the difference, but it is definetly not a value choice. You system will work fine with a 16MB cache 7200 rpm, it would also be fine with an 8MB cache, probably the only real loss is bragging rights. Also in the end the differences between SATA and SATA 2 isn't all that great. So if you find a good deal on a SATA drive don't be afraid to pull the trigger. With speedy drives and limiting start up services and programs my machine can be from a cold boot to finding servers on COD2 in about a minute. My system has 2 37GB WD 10000rpm drives in Raid0. I am sure that they are faster than most 8MB cache, 7200rpm drives. They are probably not as fast 16MB cache 7200RPM drives though. YMMV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
|
Ok first I'd like to thank everyone that helped me. I got my parts yesterday, but couldn't build my pc until today. I've got everything put together, and it all seems to be running good with one exception. I don't know how to get the monitor to actually run because the motherboard I got doesn't come with a built in video card so I'm not sure how to connect the monitor and tower. I've got my new video card in, but because I haven't installed drivers or anything yet it's not doing any good. Any help here please because I'm completely lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
Your video card will still give you a picture on the screen on first boot, regardless of the fact that drivers are not installed. If you're not getting a picture, then you have the common 'first boot, no video' problem.
Follow the instructions in this thread: http://forum.pcmech.com/showthread.php?t=132409 Also one to check, have you connected the additional 12v 4 pin power connector to your motherboard? It will be near your CPU and is seperate to the main 24 pin connector. Freakitchen
__________________
-FK- "Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw, The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die, We shall not sleep, though poppies grow, In Flanders fields." - John McCrae, May 1915 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Is the monitor connected to the video card?
Cricket
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|