|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Processor recommendation
hey guys,
I've decided to do another build as the last one i planned i never got the chance to start but i'm a little undecided over a processor. So i've got a shortlist of two: AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4200+ retail £255 http://www.autdirect.co.uk/acatalog/...rocessors.html Or AMD Athlon 64 4000+ £234 http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=88106 Both are in the price range i was expecting to pay for a processor but am undecided between the two as this would be my first 64bit build. What is the support like for the dual core processors and decent motherboard availability? bearing in mind i want this as a repacement for my gaming system
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz | Asus P6T SE| 6GB Corsair ram | XFX Radeon HD 4780 | 2 x 250 Gb Maxtor SATA II (in RAID 0), 1 x 250GB SATA II | Creative XFI soundcard | Coolermaster 650W PSU | ThermalTake Tsunami case My new website -Carp Fishing Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
Support for the dual core is just fine for the most part. The question is what you are going to be doing with this build.
If it is for gaming, I'd go with the single core. A faster single core is better for gaming than a dual core that runs more slowly, since very few games as yet can take advantage of multiple cores. However, if the build is for multitasking, then go with the dual core. Running multiple programs at once is what dual core is all about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Single core it is then
![]() Another question that springs to mind is will i still be needing to run WinXP pro (32 bit version) as i've juts been looking at the 64bit version and was wondering if my existing games would run ok on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
You can run either a 32-bit OS like Windows XP Home or Pro or a 64-bit OS like Windows XP x64 on the processor. With a 32-bit OS you aren't going to get all the advantages of the 64-bit processor, but Windows x64 still has some driver support issues. To be safest, stick with a 32-bit OS unless you are willing to experiment.
I have an AMD 64 3200+ and I am running Windows XP x64. There are a few things that won't run on it, but for the most part things are compatible. YMMV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 37.239°N , 115.816°W
Posts: 391
|
stay clear of x64 win, ive had incompatibility nightmares on my turion 2.4GHz system
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 34
|
Granted, I went from an AMD 1800+ to a dual core 3800 x2, but I've had only good experiences with the dual core processor in my gaming endeavors. So far, I haven't found a game that has problems with my x2.
While the benchmarks show that the single-core processor is a bit faster in games that don't yet take advantage of dual-core technology, you want to keep in mind that most of the new processors coming out are dual core and we can hope that game manufacturers will take this into consideration as they develop new games. Consider how long you want this system to last. A single core will allow you some performance improvement on the games out today, but if games start coming out with dual-core support you could end up missing out on that performance boost later on. Speaking of benchmarks, I ran 3DMark 05 & 06 and my scores are pretty consisent with similar single-core systems. Having said all this, I have to say that single or dual-core processor is still a matter of preference. I'm not trying to contradict doctorgonzo (never argue with doctors!) - just trying to give another perspective. Good luck on your new build! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
well, would it be likely that my Call Of Duty 2 would run on a dual-core? would most existing software still work fine on it then? im not overly fussed if some stuff wont work just that one game is really important to me as thats all i play these days, and if there is no big difference between either of the processors other than future support for dual-core processors then i may take the dual-core route but would i still get the same sort of performance using a 32 bit OS?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,616
|
Most new games are now being designed for dual core, and even more recent games are being patched to take advantage of the added head room. With the price diffrence being pretty small, I'd go for the dual core. Everything that works on single core will work just fine on dual core. You are just future proofing yourself as new games come out that will run better on dual core boxes.
__________________
Laptop HP DM4t / i5-560M / 14.1 WXGA Widescreen / 1GB Radeon Mobility 6370 / 4GB RAM / 320 GB 7200rpm HD / DVD-RW / 802.11n & BT wireless First Build Abit IC7-G Max II Motherboard / 2.8C 800mhz P4 / 1024 DDR 3200 (2x 512 in Duel Channel) / Saphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128 / Samsung 120 GB SATA HD / Lite-On 16x DVD-ROM / NEC DVD-RW |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|