|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
08-07-2006, 05:35 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 35
|
Is dual core worth it?
I'm thinking of building a new computer sometime soon (next couple of months) and was considdering Dual Core but had a couple of questions.
I use demanding programs alot, Photosho CS2, Premeire Pro 2.0 Web design software ect. But I don't multi task, so would getting one powerfull CPU to do the job be better that having two lower-powered CPUs? |
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:41 AM
|
#2 |
|
V12
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, T.E.X.A.S
Posts: 3,488
 |
Power is irrelavant when your comparing a dual core to a single. To put it simply, single cores are of the past, dual cores are now, and quad cores the future. Not only is it not cost effective to buy a single core right now, but its just not smart when you have something of such higher capability for a few bucks more. Dual cores are worth it, demanding programs are making a very good use of them and more and more programs will take a even higher advantage by becomig multithreaded in the future.
The arcitecture's are totally different and are not comparable by a simple 2x1.5ghz=1x3ghz. You will see a large perfomance increase with a dualcore versus a single core even in normal applications.
__________________
“We must not let ourselves get driven off course, no matter what happens we must stick to our natural game” -Zenedine Zidane |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:42 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England - UK
Posts: 1,226
|
Photoshop uses MultiThreading which means that both cores of a dual core would be utilised, resulting in better operation on a dual core machine than on a single core, more powerful CPU.
It is also likely that new applications will be designed for use on dual core machines so in my opinion it would be a good idea to go Dual Core 
__________________
** Custom Desktop: Core i3-530, 4GB Corsair RAM, 500GB WD HDD ** ** Netbook: HP Mini 210, N450, 2GB RAM** |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:44 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England - UK
Posts: 1,226
|
Mr.Ferrari's points are also very valid
Go Dual Core
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 11:10 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 161
|
Well, its not only these multi-threading programs that give you an edge. Its multitasking, too. I noticed a difference right away! I could go on the interent with stuff still loading in my taskbar.
So, pick yourself up a Pentium D, or if you have a lot of money to spend, get a Core 2 Duo. |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 11:50 AM
|
#6 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England - UK
Posts: 1,226
|
AMD RULES!!
Go for one of the chips that have just had the price cuts...you're sure to get a wicked deal!!!! |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 11:07 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 398
|
yea, if you aren't really worried about single core or dual core... you should go amd right now. AMD can get you a very cheap processor right now because of intels new chips coming out. You should go dual core without a doubt, however, my first priority is usually my wallet... and AMD is looking very cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 03:30 AM
|
#8 |
|
V12
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, T.E.X.A.S
Posts: 3,488
|
Intel dual cores can be found very cheap too
. 9 series are on bargain bins right now. But motherboards are cheaper on amd side.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 05:25 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
|
Quote:
- Admin - |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
