|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
Dual Core vs oldie but goodie
HI I've been drooling over barebones kits for some time now and I'm almost ready to give in and build my own computer. I've been repairing, upgrading for awhile now. WHat I'd like to know is why I should go to the expense of a new dual core processor that runs at ,say, 2 Ghz when my old eMachine runs at 2.6Ghz and handles everything I do extremely well, several programs at once? I don't NEED a new puter, just like building them but I'm thinking I just may opt for a 3 or 3.2 Celeron or whatever rather than a slower dual core. Is there something I'm missing in the way they are rated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ceiling cat is watching!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,283
|
Which dual core processors are you talking about? AMD clock speed and the new intel Core 2 Duo clock speed cannot be compared with P4's or Celerons. ANY AMD dual core processor or any Intel Core 2 Duo processor will be significantly faster than what you have.
__________________
~Matt CCNA |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
Oh I see So it's like comparing apples and oranges then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Not so new
|
You seem to be confused about the operating frequencies. Let me put it this way, think of a 2ghz processor as 2ghz x 2. It has 2 processing cores. A single core would be like this: 2.6ghz x 1. In essense what I'm trying to say is ANY DUAL CORE PROCESSOR can beat any single core chip, regardless of operating frequency. It is no longer a game of operating frequency in the CPU world.
__________________
“To me there are three things everyone should do every day. Number one is laugh. Number two is think -- spend some time in thought. Number three, you should have your emotions move you to tears. If you laugh, think and cry, that's a heck of a day.” - Jim Valvano |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
|
Yes, each core runs at 2 GHz, but that is NOT as fast as a single core at 4 Ghz.
The issue here is the new core architectures. Both AMD and Intel's new cores are a lot more efficient than the old cores. Raw clock speed is now essentially meaningless. What you need to do is benchmark comparisons - to see how fast work gets done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
ok I understand much better now Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
Quote:
So, if you want to do something that takes a lot of horse power and use your computer for other things, then dualie is the answer. If not, then you don't need one, as you stated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
|
Then again, if your 2.6 is a Celeron, that's kinda weak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ceiling cat is watching!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,283
|
TwoRails, what exactly do you mean by "crunching"? Are you compressing the movies using xvid or some other codec or burning them off onto DVDs? Most good video software is actually multi-threaded, so it still hogs your whole computer even with a dual-core, it just gets done much much faster. I have an AMD X2-4600+ and I can max out both cores when I'm compressing movies with Xvid, because the codec supports SMP. The computer is still useable since I run the thread at low priority, but I definitely don't have one core that's just sitting around waiting for me to give it things to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
I pretty typically use TMPGNec for my crunching. I do have other programs, though. TMPGNec has an on and off the switch for multithreading, but my 4800+ has enough horsepower that even when I am using it in multithreaded mode I can use to computer for other tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Ceiling cat is watching!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,283
|
I wish I could have a 4800+. It seems to be vaporware for socket AM2. I've seen a couple OEM chips now, but back in august there was absolutely nothing to be found.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do I NEED dual core? | telegramsam | Computer Hardware | 12 | 08-29-2006 06:16 PM |
| Dual Core Processors | danman2005 | Computer Hardware | 6 | 02-20-2006 03:34 PM |
| intel dual core or amd dual core? | ice | Computer Hardware | 36 | 01-15-2006 05:47 PM |
| Pentium Dual Core Build Need Help | tsweeks | Build Your Own PC | 2 | 12-16-2005 03:26 PM |
| Dual Processor vs. Dual Core | kosova | Computer Hardware | 3 | 09-05-2005 04:07 AM |