Intel boards?

[Milliron1]

I notice that nearly every new build these days seems to include an ASUS P5 or similar board. In the past I have used Intel boards coupled with Intel CPU's. I don't overclock, so it seemed to make more sense to me. Intel speaks of a particular synergy between their boards and CPUs, assuming that isn't just marketing nonsense. I can say, however, that I have never experienced a problem with an Intel board.

Assuming you don't wish to overclock, is there any reason to use/not use an Intel board with an Intel build? Why is everyone building with the Asus board, even if they aren't OC'ing?

[EzyStvy]

Its just a personall choice thing...Both companies make good boards.

[XenaWP]

Perhaps there's a perception that Intel are premium priced? In general I would tend to go for the bargain (same functionality at a lower price), but with my first build, as the Intel was rec'd here and by someone I respect, I chose it. No regrets.

[Mr.Ferrari]

Intel motherboards tend to be rock solid. The BIOS is newbie friendly, minimal and to the point.

Its up to you, but a Intel motherboard would not be a bad choice at all. But check out the Asus boards first, they come with extra features that might be advantageous to you.

[Milliron1]

Originally Posted by Mr.Ferrari Intel motherboards tend to be rock solid. The BIOS is newbie friendly, minimal and to the point. Its up to you, but a Intel motherboard would not be a bad choice at all. But check out the Asus boards first, they come with extra features that might be advantageous to you.

Well, I will admit the Asus boards are making me curious. Historically I build for "solid as a rock" versus "super kewl", hence the Intel boards. What features about the Asus board (or perhaps the BIOS) do you find appealing? I want to know as I am powering up for another build and may consider the Asus board.