Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Build Your Own PC

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-14-2007, 08:48 PM   #1
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
New computer, similar budget as last build

I want to get my dad a new computer for Christmas. I was going to make an exact copy of what I put together for myself back in June of 2006, just because I know all the parts work good together, but then got to thinking a lot of new stuff is probably out there.

What I bought back in June of 06 was...

$150 ASUS P5LD2 Deluxe LGA 775 Intel 945P ATX Intel Motherboard
$178 Intel Pentium D 930 Presler 3.0GHz LGA 775 95W Processor
$143 CORSAIR ValueSelect 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 667 (PC2 5300)
$100 Antec LifeStyle SONATA II Piano Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case 450Watt SmartPower 2.0 Power Supply

What would be todays equivalent? If I can just get some direction with the motherboard, CPU, RAM, and what PSU to go with it, I can figure out the rest on my own (or ask about it later). I just haven't kept up with the new technology.

Thanks,
Brian
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:06 PM   #2
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Asus P5K-E
Intel E6750
Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800
Antec Sonata 3

Do you need a video card? If he isn't gaming, get the P5K-VM board with onboard video.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:15 PM   #3
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
No gaming at all. He might do a little (very little) bit of 2D cad work.

A question about the motherboard and RAM. Even though the specs on for the motherboard says 8GB RAM supported, from what I understand, XP will only support 2GB. Is that correct?
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:21 PM   #4
I like me
 
shadowpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
xp (32 bit) will show anywhere from 2.75 to 3.25gb.

A 64 bit OS would be needed for it to see more.
__________________
It's coming....just you wait.
shadowpr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:40 PM   #5
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Thanks shadowpr, that is what I thought. I remember 32 bit XP limiting the amount of RAM.

To anyone else..
How come the P5K-E board (without onboard video) is more money than the P5K-VM (with onboard video)? What does the P5K-E have that the P5K-VM doesn't?

Thanks
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 09:55 PM   #6
Member (7 bit)
 
wildfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizDawg
Thanks shadowpr, that is what I thought. I remember 32 bit XP limiting the amount of RAM.

To anyone else..
How come the P5K-E board (without onboard video) is more money than the P5K-VM (with onboard video)? What does the P5K-E have that the P5K-VM doesn't?

Thanks
I'm pretty sure that the P5K-E has wireless and uses a new P35 Chipset. The P5K-VM has onboard video, No wireless and uses a G33 Chipset.
wildfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:37 PM   #7
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Set up a comparison at Newegg, you will find that the P5K-E has a lot more features, which I doubt you would really need anyway. I'd say do the P5K-VM and add a video card later if it's needed. It has a PCI-Ex16 slot. I'd recommend XP and 2 gigs of ram for now.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 11:00 PM   #8
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
I am a little confused to the relation between the motherboard, CPU, and RAM.

What I run now and was told was compatible parts is..
Mobo FSB 1066/800/533 MHz
RAM DDR2-533
CPU D930 800 MHz FSB

The parts GLC suggested would be
Mobo FSB 1333/1066MHz
RAM DDR2-800
CPU Intel E6750 1333MHz

Which numbers are suppose to match?

Thanks
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 09:42 AM   #9
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
The motherboard has to be able to support the processor bus speed. We recommend that you use ram that is one step faster than the bus - the base bus for a 1333 bus processor is 333, the exact match ram would be 667. 800 is one step faster than 667.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 11:43 AM   #10
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
Do you need a video card? If he isn't gaming, get the P5K-VM board with onboard video.
Don't mean to hijack this thread, but I see this comment from a lot of people here and have a question. I have always used a seperate video card, not because of the need for better video (because I don't play video intensive games), but to get all of that substantial load of video off of the main system. Certainly that includes the use of system memory for video memory, but doesn't the use of on on-board GPU also require the use of the CPU? In other words, I'm not worried about better video, I'm worried about better overall system performance and want to get the video off the main system. The other less important (but video-related) reason is because even if the on-board GPU is as good, the system memory and the memory bus speed are both way slower than the memory and memory bus speed of a seperate video card.

Conseqeuntly, to me the choice has always been, if you game, get a good fast video card with lots of memory designed for gaming; if you don't game get a nice basic video card with, say, 256m of memory. But I've never really considered using the on-board video. Right now, something like a 256meg Radeon HD 2400Pro would probably be great for non-gamers, costs less than $100, and gets all the video processing load off the mainboard. Even a cheaper than that card would probably suffice.

But after reading these forums, I'm thinking that my view on this could be oudated and tied to the days when a lot of the processing for onboard video was handled by the CPU itself. Maybe my concerns aren't valid any more. That's why I'm asking for your thoughts on the subject. Thanks in advance.
ArtBest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 12:19 PM   #11
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Today's processors are fast and strong enough that the extra load is not significant. Hence my recommendation to use the onboard, you can always add a card later if you need to.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 09:50 PM   #12
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
The motherboard has to be able to support the processor bus speed. We recommend that you use ram that is one step faster than the bus - the base bus for a 1333 bus processor is 333, the exact match ram would be 667. 800 is one step faster than 667.
How do you know the exact match for a 1333 MHz bus (133 MHz base bus) is 667 RAM? How is it figured out? Just curious.


What is the base bus for my 800 MHz bus Pentium D? What is the exact match RAM? At the time I was told to get 533, but 667 was cheaper, thats why I have that.

Thanks
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 10:56 AM   #13
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Divide the processor by 4, divide the ram by 2. 1333 base bus is 333, not 133. 800 base bus is 200. Exact match for the 800 P-D is 400, 533 is one step higher. 667 is fine, it will downclock if necessary.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 12:35 PM   #14
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Thanks.

Question about the motherboard with on board video. You suggested the P5K-VM. When I search it on newegg, I get this link...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131187

Its description is Micro ATX form factor. Is that correct. Will it fit in the Sonata 3 case and work with that PSU that comes with that case? The other board your sugested, the P5K-E, says its just ATX, which I would guess is different.
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 01:21 PM   #15
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Micros fit fine in standard cases and have the same PSU connectors. If you want a full size board for whatever reason, get a P5K-V.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 01:24 PM   #16
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
Micros fit fine in standard cases and have the same PSU connectors. If you want a full size board for whatever reason, get a P5K-V.

Nope, MICRO is fine with me. And its cheaper. I assume it works just as well. Just wanted to check the compatibility.
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 04:05 PM   #17
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,044
More mATX boards have on-board video because they are commonly used in small case set ups which dont have room for video cards. When buying a mATX board just be sure it has the connectors you need and want. The smaller boards come with fewer bells and whistles, but if they have what you need then they are fine.

Kat
__________________
ANTEC 900 / ASUS P5K / C2D E6750 / SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6750 1 GB/ CORSAIR 620 HX / CORSAIR XMS 4GB DDR2 800 / SEAGATE 320 GB / LITE-ON 20X DVD BURNER / WINDOWS 7 PROFESSIONAL / LOGITECH MX 518 MOUSE / SAITEK ECLIPSE KEYBOARD / ACER 22” WS LCD
Katreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 12:47 AM   #19
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,765
Incorrect ram - that's CAS 4 2.1 volt. You need CAS 5 1.8 or 1.9 volt for best stability.

Rest looks good. If you think a memory card reader would be handy, look at the Mitsumi combo floppy drive/card reader instead of the plain old floppy.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 05:00 PM   #20
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 144
glc, I have a question now. I had pretty much decided one the P5K-E board. Is the PK5-V a better more stable board? What is the main difference in the two?
Barbrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 07:22 PM   #21
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
Incorrect ram - that's CAS 4 2.1 volt. You need CAS 5 1.8 or 1.9 volt for best stability.

Rest looks good. If you think a memory card reader would be handy, look at the Mitsumi combo floppy drive/card reader instead of the plain old floppy.

Oh no, out of that whole list I already bought 2 things, and 1 of them happened to be the RAM. I will return it or see if I can cancel the order if it did not ship yet.

glc,
Can you send me the newegg link for the correct RAM. I can't see to find it.

Thanks
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 09:07 AM   #22
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
 
Cricket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizDawg
Can you send me the newegg link for the correct RAM. I can't see to find it.
Here ya go.

Cricket
Cricket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 04:40 PM   #23
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
I just gave this new computer to my dad and we are having 1 problem. I am using the on-board video from the Asus P5K-VM motherboard. The manual says it supports up to 2084 x 1536 @ 75 Hz. The monitor I got him was a Samsung WM220. This is a 22" wide screen with a native resolution of 1680 x 1050. I can't seem to find this resolution. It is not an option in the drop down box. How can I fix this? Does the onboard video of the P5K-VM not support this specific resolution?

-Brian
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 05:45 PM   #24
I like me
 
shadowpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
Did you install the drivers for the onboard video?
shadowpr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 06:50 PM   #25
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowpr
Did you install the drivers for the onboard video?
Yes, from Asus.com, then samsung.com, then intel.com, no luck with any of those.
WizDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
first time build, budget gamer wickety6 Build Your Own PC 2 10-03-2007 07:19 PM
Reasons to build your own computer kjcookin Build Your Own PC 11 10-04-2005 08:47 PM
Never Build a Computer master56 Computer Hardware 7 10-19-2004 02:11 PM
First Computer Build Setup . . Budget Gamer? Shamrocked Computer Hardware 23 08-29-2003 12:11 PM
Budget build - pulling my hair out!! Surge1243 Computer Hardware 18 08-17-2003 07:50 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2