|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,149
|
Thank god for tax refunds, I got 2k back and it will be in tomorrow or wensday so I'm using it towards my build. I wanted sum suggestions, should I go with vista or stick with XP, also is ddr2 1066 that much faster then 800 and if so should i get the ram at 1066 or 800 and over clock?
cpu cooler ThermalRight Ultra 120 case COOLER MASTER Stacker 830 Evo dvd LITE-ON 20X DVD±R DVD Burner with LightScribe Black SATA floppy MITSUMI Black 1.44MB 3.5" Internal USB 2.0 digital card reader hd Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500GB 3.5 vid card XFX 8800GT Alpha Dog 670mhz XXX 512MB zipzoomfly psu PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 mouse Microsoft SideWinder HKA-00001 Black or mx518 ram Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1066 zipzoomfly mobo EVGA 122-CK-NF68-A1 LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI (EVGA 680i SLI A1) zipzoomfly cpu Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 clubit.com keyboard Ideazon Merc Stealth Illuminated Gaming Keyboard ups Cyber power CP1500va 900w ups Any suggestions? Also does the pcmech cd guide on here that you buy say how to overclock because I was plaining on buying that. I want to over clock the cpu to at least 3.2 so its on par with the e6750. all suggestions would be greatly appreciated, thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 904
|
For the ram, get the corsair xms2 instead.
I say go for a asus p5k board unless you are going SLI with the evga mobo. Go with the new EVGA GTS (G92) card. Other than that, your list looks good. Most people would say stick to windows xp 32 bit. But if you want to go vista, go with the 32 bit version. Vista will be better for games as it uses the direct x 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,149
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 904
|
Quote:
I don't recommend going SLI, not work the money for a 30% increase in power. Might as well get a good card now. Or wait for the new 9800 card to come out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,149
|
but i thought the performance increase wasnt worth the extra money from threads i read? on a side note at least i'll have a month to play with the rig cuz my 360 just died an its a 4-6 week turn around AHHHH!!!!! IM SO PISSED!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 904
|
I think it is worth it and you'll be set for awhile unless you plan on upgrading to the new 9xxx series when they are released. You might have been confused between the performance increase of the GTS and GTX. The GTX slightly outperforms the GTS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,149
|
Quote:
in april
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 304
|
Dave, I thought I told you already...the GT and GTS 512 MB are the same G92 core, one is just clocked higher. The 320-640 MB GTS is the G8x core.
Prometheus, save you money and go for a GT. You are right, the performance increase is too small. I think Dave is the confused one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 904
|
Yea, I know both the GT and the GTS have the G92 chip, I was just giving him an opinion. Depending on which bundle you get the cards with, the GTS might be worth it as some come with the game Crysis.
Here's a review http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/...00_gts_512_mb/ if any one wants to read it. The card I recommend is just an option compared to the GTX where the performance is almost the same and in most cases it outperforms the GTX. Now I know the cost-performance ratio between the GT and GTS is not very appealing since the GTS performs slightly better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,044
|
If you are set on SLI, you really should look at the new 750i and 780i boards. The 680i is getting a bit long in the tooth and the new chips where developed for the faster 1333 FSB CPUs. I know the Q6600 is only 1000 FSB, but who knows, you may want to upgrade in the future. All that being said, I agree with the others and unless you print your own money, or have a HUGE monitor, SLI is not all that hot of an investment.
Kat
__________________
ANTEC 900 / ASUS P5K / C2D E6750 / SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6750 1 GB/ CORSAIR 620 HX / CORSAIR XMS 4GB DDR2 800 / SEAGATE 320 GB / LITE-ON 20X DVD BURNER / WINDOWS 7 PROFESSIONAL / LOGITECH MX 518 MOUSE / SAITEK ECLIPSE KEYBOARD / ACER 22” WS LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 304
|
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphi...1057&chart=318
I always had the thought that since this guy is going to overclock his cpu, why not overclock his gpu? It's really easy. I've even gotten a stable 641 core and 1032 (2064) memory with my G80 320 MB GTS. (with no volt mods) Prometheus, I don't under stand the 3.2 Ghz to make it "on par" with the E6750. It is a quad core not a dual-core. In 1 or 2 thread apps, the Q6600 would fall behind a little. In quad threaded apps, the Q6600 would suceed by far. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mobo upgraded...video problems... | Renanton | Computer Hardware | 0 | 02-12-2005 04:53 PM |
| shutdown | ibanez074 | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 1 | 10-24-2003 01:02 PM |
| DirectX problems. Need Expert! | Doopa | Software Discussion & Support | 1 | 08-18-2003 11:33 AM |
| Computer Locks Up | russstodieck | Computer Hardware | 2 | 02-18-2002 01:16 AM |
| Computer Locks Up | russstodieck | Computer Hardware | 1 | 02-17-2002 07:16 PM |