|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
Should i build a moderate pc for say, 700-1000 bucks, or build a godlike system for 1800 bucks? ive got two builds at top of the line products but the cheaper computer would fit in an older category. heres the specs *wish chipset and fsb but not mobo*
Cheap(er): 2.5ghz amd processor 790fx chipset (2400 fsb hyper) 3870 x2 3 x 2.0 x16 (x16 x16 crossfire, x16 x16 physics, or x16 x16 x8) 750w psu 4gig of ocz 800 at 4-4-4-12 Second Cheapest: 2.5 Intel Processor 780i (1333 fsb) 2 X 8800gt 1gig oc edition 2 x 2.0 X16 (X16 X16 1 X16 800w psu *modular* 4gig of ocz 800 at 4-4-4-12 Expensive: 2.5 intel processor X48 (1333 fsb) 4870 2 X 2.0 X16 (X16 X16 crossfire) 1000w psu *modular* 4gig of ocz 800 at 4-4-4-12 Last edited by Reista; 08-05-2008 at 10:22 PM. Reason: missed RAM on one =p |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Southeastern Texas
Posts: 634
|
I am completely confused as to what you are asking. What are you wanting to do with the PC?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
Which one should i get, an expensive really really good computer that isnt good in a while or one that already isnt so good without any premium. Which would be the most beneficial for gaming. i know new tech doesn't hold its edge for very long
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Kickin' it
Staff
Premium Member
|
I think its best to build for the best bang for the buck. Right now you can do very well for around $1000. Going too high end is really spending a lot of money for less and less gain.
Reista, some links included with your parts would help us follow what you're considering.
__________________
Fold for PCMech: Team 13761 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
i would link it all but its 3 builds that would take quite a bit of time =p i suppose im going to go with the outdated computer (not to outdated mind you) and use that opposed to the new one and not pay the premium =]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 495
|
If you're considering the "second cheapest" option, I would use a 4870 in that, too, instead of SLI 8800GTs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 22
|
I've always felt 3 video cards is a complete waste of money unless you're obsessed with benchmark results. Some games don't even play as well with 3 cards instead of 2. What size is the screen you're using? If anything smaller than 24" then sli/crossfire will give you very little performance gains. I would drop 2 and go with one decent card, then you can drop the psu down to a 650-750w one, save some cash and still have a good rig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
The benefit of sli is huge in some games and small in others but now that i look at it i see what your saying, it would be a good move because sli and crossfire are mostly status items for a large part and water cooling as well for that matter. Thanks for the input ill work on a 4th build that revolves around 1 graphics card and most likely a physics card on an x16 input slot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 22
|
PhysX was bought by Nvidia, so If you go with nvidia, all the newest cards with the latest drivers support the PhysX engine so it's like a 2 for one deal. Buying a dedicated PhysX card would probably be a redundancy at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
i wasn't getting nvidia lol.. well... i dont know yet exactly =p
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 22
|
Oh ok, lol. Well, just let us know, we'll be here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
Thanks much =] im set on a specific build that will last me at least 5 years (excluding the GFX card) for 1300 and with GFX its 1470 =] liquid cooling and all (not frilly stuff like lighting though) ill post my build in a while.. theres a few kinks in it and itll take a while to post =p
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|