|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,165
|
If you built it and works to your satisfaction, have fun.
Quality parts. Can get to be a spitting contest like Coke vs Pepsi, Ford vs Chevy.
__________________
"Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
the DUKE!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 1,596
|
I would use any of these drives before I would want a WD green for a primary drive:
Newegg.com - Western Digital Caviar Blue WD5000AAKX 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive Yes its half the quantity and less cache but with this you keep the 6gb/s data burst. Not as crucial but the blue drives are designed to be used as primary drives. The WD greens are not designed for this type of use. Newegg.com - Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive 1tb / 64mb cache / 6gb/s The only drawback here is Seagate hasn't been on the reccomended list due to thier problems a few years back. No recent problems have been reported, and I personally would rather use one of these drives before I had to use a drive that is designed to be for storage data as a primary drive. Newegg.com - Western Digital Caviar Black WD1001FALS 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive 1tb / 32meg cache / 3gb/s I think this is really the best choice at Newegg for your price point. No you dont get the 6gb/s, but these WD blacks came with the best reccomendations for a primary drive before the 6gb/s drives were available. From what I've read on the 6gb/s drives they are not that much fasster than thier 3gb/s counterparts. It's calculated in the data burst and it really depends on the application being used if there is to be a difference. For the most part the averasge user isn't going to see a difference in the 3gb/s drives and the 6gb/s drives. The biggest reason the 6gb/s are reccomended is because there's barely a price differnce for the newer technology, if at all.
__________________
Gigabyte 880GA-ud3h / 3.1 Phenom II x2 550 BE Callisto(4 cores and OC to 3.4) / Corsair Vengence 2x4gb DDR3 1600 / 640gb WD Black 2ea./HIS 6870/ 650 EarthWatts / Win 7 64bit Last edited by rwest; 02-23-2012 at 12:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,165
|
And an SSD just about as cheap if not more so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
the DUKE!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 1,596
|
Yep, for about 50 bucks more you get into something like this:
Newegg.com - Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CT040G3K5 2.5" 40GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) and use this: Newegg.com - Seagate Barracuda ST500DM002 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive Wait for someone else to verify the SSD though, I personally have not used one. Best performance scenario is with Intel's Smart Response Technology. Last edited by rwest; 02-23-2012 at 02:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
What would be the advantage of an SSD?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,180
|
Faster bootup and faster program opening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
OK, I'm really considering the whole SSD setup, this is what I came up with:
SSD: Newegg.com - Corsair Nova Series 2 CSSD-V60GB2 2.5" 60GB SATA II Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) HDD: Newegg.com - Western Digital Caviar Blue WDBAAX5000ENC-NRSN 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Opinions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,180
|
The hard drive I recommended and this:
Newegg.com - Intel 520 Series Cherryville SSDSC2CW060A310 2.5" 60GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
the DUKE!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 1,596
|
I get my advice from GLC. Its best to use his reccomendations.
Those parts together are $265 The two I suggested are $180 GLC would you say the $85 dollar difference is essential for quality? Would the parts I suggested be feasible on a budget? or do you say just dont go with them? Same questions too on the Corsair Nova the OP listed. I thought (read or heard)the Corsair brand of ssd was decent. I have no personal experience with them. Last edited by rwest; 02-24-2012 at 10:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,180
|
Both drives I recommended are SATA 6.0 and the hard drive is 1tb instead of 500mb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
Decided to go with a larger SSD and a smaller HDD. Plan on using the SSD for booting and program loading.
SSD: Newegg.com - Crucial M4 CT128M4SSD2 2.5" 128GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) HDD: Newegg.com - Western Digital AV-GP WD5000AUDX 500GB IntelliPower 32MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive The SSD looks to be really great, not overly sure on the HDD. Still trying to read up on it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|