|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
|
Power supply wattage?!?!?!?!?
Im trying to find out what wattage is needed for my build. i dont want to go way overboard but having some headroom would be nice.
Specs of the build are as follows: Sabertooth z77 OR Maximus V Formula (im undesided) Corsair Vengeance 32GB Kit 2 1.5TB WD HD 1 Intel 520 (128GB) 2 Sapphire HD 7970 OR 2 GTX 680 LG Bluray 3D burner D5 Pump 4 UV Cathodes 3 120 MM fans 1 240MM fan (comes in case). i was thinking around 1000W but i dont know if i will need more or if i could go with less. any help would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 165
|
__________________
ASUS P7P55D-E | Intel I5-760 @ 2.8GHz | Corsair XMS3 8Gb @ 1333MHz | WD Caviar Black 1TB | HIS Radeon 6850 | Corsair 750TX 750W | ASUS 24x DVD Burner | Antec Nine Hundred | ASUS VW246H 24" | Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
|
too old of links i guess... half the links are broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 40,384
|
Your limiting factor is going to be the number and type of PCI-E connectors if you are going to be using 2 cards. 750 quality watts should be enough, but it wouldn't hurt to have a bit more. I would probably go with at least an 850, preferably modular, and either Seasonic or Corsair HX/AX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
|
i was looking at the corsair ax850 but i wasn't sure if that was going to be enough. i dont want the psu to be running at 80% load all the time though. will 850 be a prime wattage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO U.S.A.
Posts: 499
|
This might give you a ballpark idea: Newegg Power Supply Calculator.
There are other PS Calculators out there too (to get a "second" opinion).
__________________
Give Linux a try. There is a distro made just for you! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 6,293
|
High quality PSU's, like what glc listed, can easily sustain that percentage of maximum load. They are engineered for doing this. It is the junk PSU's that cannot reach their maximum claimed load or have other problems such as not being able to keep the correct rail voltages at high loads. This is two of a number of reasons why the experts here only recommend the highest quality PSU's
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | Last edited by David M; 01-28-2013 at 08:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 6,293
|
If you are nervous about it and the calculator has it that close to 750 watts then I would get the 850 watt unit. The piece of mind is probably worth the extra money, even if you might never need the additional 100 watts. That's what I would do in your situation.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...5&Tpk=850%20ax http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...1&Tpk=850%20hx For a 10 dollar difference you might as well get the AX. Gaming computers are never under a full load all the time unless all you do with your computer is to run stress tests on your graphics cards all day long. You probably want to run a few stress tests on your system after you get it up and running to make sure it is going to work under a worse case scenario for your PSU and graphics cards.Have you considered a 690 instead of two 680's? This would be more power efficient and the total graphics processing power is about the same, with two 680's being only slightly faster. I don't think the difference was worth it. The single 690 would also be less expensive. You would also not have to run SLI. I saw this info in a review of the 690 comparing it to two 680's. Last edited by David M; 01-28-2013 at 09:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
|
OK! Thanks, and corsair and silverstone are the highest recommended?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 6,293
|
The high end HX and AX Corsairs and the Seasonics...like glc said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 4,972
|
Seasonic X850 GOLD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Graham, TX
Posts: 677
|
Actually good PSU's like the seasonic and seasonic made corsairs run at their most efficient at around 80% load. That is why you don't want to buy a 1200 watt psu when you only need 450, it won't meet its efficiency rating at that low of a load. My personal opinion is I like to be between 65%-80% load on a psu. So with an 850w psu I want between 550w to 700w of draw, so if its a gaming build I try to get the idle power consumption at the low end (65%) that way when the gpu is at full load it doesn't go over 75-80%.
__________________
Case: Thermaltake V9 Blacx Motherboard: Intel DP55WB Processor: I7 875K OC 4.0ghz GPU: EVGA GTX 660 Cooler: Zerotherm Core92 Ram: Kingston 8gb ddr3-1333 PSU: Corsair HX-850 HDD: Intel X-25 40gb SSD, 2 Seagate 1tb drives |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|