|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
07-15-2004, 03:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
Intel processor numbers quick reference
Found this over at Intel and thought it may come in handy for builders and enthusiasts alike, with the new naming scheme at intel. Sorry had to ZIP it to get it to fit, it's supposed to be a little quick reference thingy you can print out and fashion into a key-ring type set up.
__________________
...wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat... Last edited by Redfallon; 07-15-2004 at 04:00 PM. |
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 03:31 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 628
|
Can't unzip it, keeps on saying file is damaged.
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 03:48 PM
|
#3 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
probably because I just zipped it with xp....I have winzip at home will try re-doing it later tonight. Actually, that's interesting. I uploaded the file using firefox, downloaded it just fine in firefox. IE however, gave me the corrupted file msg. Anyone else using firefox that can confirm this?
Last edited by Redfallon; 07-15-2004 at 03:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 03:55 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
|
Firefox user here, getting no corrupted messages. Another sign IE sucks
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 03:57 PM
|
#5 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
i edited the post, removed the attachment, and reuploaded with IE....still get the message...strange.
**edit** ok winzipped the file, re-attached it, still no dice with IE. Firefox works fine again here. Looks like the IE users won't be lookin. Last edited by Redfallon; 07-15-2004 at 04:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 04:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
Very nice Redfallon, this will defnitely come in handy. I also tested it with IE, and no luck. That's odd that it would work with one browser and not another.
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 05:10 PM
|
#7 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
Nice find, Redfallon
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 06:13 PM
|
#8 |
|
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,538
 |
Add me to the list of "can't open it"! How bout a link to the web site?
__________________
Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns. |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 06:34 PM
|
#9 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
This should be it Didn't know if it'd work or not, thought it might require a PW, let me know if anyone else has trouble with that link.
Last edited by Redfallon; 07-15-2004 at 06:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 07:08 PM
|
#10 |
|
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,538
|
Thanx, Red! Worked that time with Adobe. Saved a copy in my Hardware tips file.
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 07:42 PM
|
#11 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,309
|
NIce, what does Celeron-D mean though, is that just the new processor name or is it somethign special?
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 07:49 PM
|
#12 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
prescott core celery is a D, i believe.
|
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 07:50 PM
|
#13 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
|
Celeron D is a Prescott core Celeron, and has 256k cache with a 533MHz FSB. It is a lot better than the Northwood Celeron, probably because of the Prescott's improved branch predictor. Here is some benchmarks, as you can see they even give Athlon XP 2800+'s a run for their money. Overclocking beasts too:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...celeron-d.html |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 08:37 PM
|
#14 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,309
|
Oh yeha, now I remember that...I knew I heard of it.
**edit I just looked at those reviews...those processors are crazy overclockers...a cheap alternative if you want 3.2E speeds witha a 2.8 processor with 1/4 the cache...that's crazy. Last edited by icallmedan; 07-15-2004 at 08:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
07-15-2004, 09:18 PM
|
#15 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
|
Yeah, making me think of getting into overclocking myself
. Pick up a cheap Celeron D, get some cooling for that Prescott core, an IC7-MAX3, some fast RAM, and I should be set! Apart from the fact I don't have that much money to throw around  .
|
|
|
|
|
07-16-2004, 07:10 AM
|
#16 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,309
|
If I was going to spend 180 on a motherboard, I wold get a processor that cost a little bit more than the board...lol...But it could be a nice temporary upgrade, unitl you could afford a Northwood 3.2 to overclock....
|
|
|
|
|
07-16-2004, 07:35 AM
|
#17 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 32
  |
well... i downloaded it thru slimbrowser(ie based) and it didnt open.. but it was fine after i got it thru opera!
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
