|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
07-17-2004, 01:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gulf Breeze, Florida
Posts: 194
|
Athlon 64 mobile
If I wanted to overclock on a new build would it be smarter to go with the mobile version or the regular? I'm assuming it would be the mobile, just want to know what yall think.
Thanks |
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 01:54 PM
|
#2 |
|
Stereo junkie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Just North of Fort Pontchartrain du Détroit
Posts: 3,393
 |
the mobiles A64s are pretty good OCers, but many have trouble with them due to the fact that it doesnt have a heatspreader. without the heatspreader, it is much harder to have the surface of the HS rest on the CPU, most people have to modify the cooler to fit properly so they dont get a gap between the HS and CPU. it would be more feasible to go with a desktop unit this time around. the better OCers are the 3200+ clawhammer and the 3000+ newcastle.
__________________
Main: P180 | ASUS P8Z68-V LX | i5 2500K | 8GB HyperX 1600 | Sparkle 560Ti | HyperX SSD 120GB | OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Debian 6.0.3 | Win 7 Pro Secondary: Sonata II | GB P35-DS3L | Q9300 | 4GB 800 | eVGA 9500GT | OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Fedora 15 Server: Chenbro SR10769 | Supermicro X7DWE | 2x Xeon L5420 | 8GB FB Kingston 667 | Rosewill RC-218 | 4x 500GB WD RE3 RAID 10 | 4x 1TB Hitachi 7K3000.C | Ubuntu Server 10.04.3 | a bunch of virtual machines Laptop: Dell Inspiron 11z | Pentium SU4100 | 4GB 667 | 60GB OCZ Vertex 2 | Ubuntu 11.04 Media clients: 4x Apple TV 2 w/ XBMC | 3x Squeezebox Duet |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
