|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
Sounds good. I'd just keep with speeddude's build with a X600.
fedz
__________________
If it's broke, fix it If it ain't, overclock it ------------------------- http://img64.exs.cx/img64/309/mypc8ursmall2ts.png |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
|
Ah, well better know know then after I buy it, thanks for the info Timbit...
well... I have two choices again... go with a normal non-pcie mobo and take a very good card. OR go with pcie mobo and take an x600... any suggestions? How long do you think until a regular AGP mobo becomes obsolete? A month? Year? Two years? Maybe I can last long with an AGP board... |
|
|
|
|
|
#153 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
|
I am soo confused, and I am breaking myself over it...
I know I can get a much more powerful system with AMD... but I dont know about its future, its plans or nothing, I am more familiar with Intel... but if I go with Intel I will get a less powerful system for now but know I can upgrade in a couple years... I DONT KNOW. I hate this dilemna.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 270
|
Your probably not gonna be able to upgrade, as Intel is moving to 1066FSB soon, and only the 925x chipset supports that(right?). So just go with AMD and when the times comes to upgrade, sell the old rig off and buy a new one. I'll post an AMD build, if you like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
-ignore this-
Last edited by fedz; 09-06-2004 at 12:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
Go with the PCI-E and X600. The X600 will play anything out now. As I said, if you're more familiar with intel keep with speeddude's build. It's really good and very upgradeable.
When 800FSB came out on 478, did they phase out the 533's? I think not... You'll be safe with that. fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 270
|
Just giving you an AMD build to think about...
Enlight ATX MID-TOWER CASE with 360Watt POWER SUPPLY: 67.49$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...116-152&depa=1 AMD Athlon 64 2800+: 148$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...103-452&depa=1 ABIT "KV8 Pro": 106$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...127-178&depa=1 Corsair Value Select 184 Pin 512MB DDR PC-3200: 75.99$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...145-026&depa=1 POWERCOLOR ATI RADEON 9800PRO EZ Video Card: 159$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...131-279&depa=1 Western Digital 80GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive: 69.50$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...135-106&depa=1 Sony Beige 52X32X52X16 Combo Drive: 41.99$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...106-818&depa=1 SONY Beige 1.44MB 3.5Inch Floppy Disk Drive: 9.99$ http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...103-109&depa=0 Windows XP OEM: 90$ http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduc...102-141&DEPA=0 Total before monitor: 767.96$ |
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
Nice component choice.
1. Not as upgradeable as the pentium build 2. If you prefer intel because you're more familiar with it, go for it. Better start with a build that you're familiar with, then work your way onto greater things. Both suggested builds will be about as fast, except that GForce64's is marginally better graphicswise. Your choice!!! fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Posts: 346
|
hmmmm... not liking the graphics pick in gforce's build. that 9800 is one of the crippled ones -- the bus is only 128 bits. its cheap, yes, but it's not much better than a 9600xt or 9700... i'm thinking you probably want something like this. it costs just under $40 more though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 996
|
if u choose an AMD build check mine out too, its not bad :-P
hes missing keyboard+mouse and the gfx card i picked out is better. the mobo i chose is cheaper, and not necessaraly worse, it has nforce3 chipset which is said to be better than via chipsets, not sure about these 2 models though. besides that i think his build looks similar to mine, so thats cool. :-P KoMoDo |
|
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 87
|
even if your not as familar with AMD do it any ways cause youll need to leearn someday. Its more bang for your buckk who doensent want that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
I'd stick with intel, and I've built both AMD and intel.
fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
|
Well, I am going with intel, my uncle says so, my other uncle says so, and I say so.
Intel is for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
also, intels new socket CPU type is really easy to install(or at least impossible to break) because it doesnt have any external pins....even the ZIF was supposed to be flawless in the 478, i still bent a few pins when i opened the container(got a little excited and it popped up and the heatsink hit the CPU and bent a few pins, but its all fixed now. socket T is a good type for 1st time builders.
__________________
![]() Pentium 4 2.8E Prescott-512MB PC2700 Dual Channel-160GB Sata HDD-Logitech Z-640 5.1 Speakers-Sound Blaster Live! 5.1-Sapphire Atlantis Radeon 9600-Sony DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive 52x/24x/52x/16 took out the logo for now. need a link for the small, dark blue version thx |
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
|
iTroll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 818
Posts: 2,252
|
Quote:
lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
nice choice. Good luck with your build (make sure that you post your final specs here) and don't hesitate to come back and ask if you have any problems/questions/issues whatsoever
fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
|
yeah, ima try once more in making my build, based on what I learned from the thread and from other people's builds. You guys helped me alot, I realy appreciate the help I get when I come to these forums, its truly one of the best communities if not the best out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
Stop press! Nvidia has released its 6600 range, and they way outpace the 9800 pro, 5950 and in some cases the X800 pro.
$150 to $200. That OK? fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Posts: 346
|
yeah, it should outperform the 9600xt, i think, but i don't see any in the retail channels yet... and who knows how long it will be before they are out there. could still be a month. still, if you can wait, this would be interesting to look at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
See my thread in audio/video. They'll be out in mid september (albatron have already started releasing some)
fedz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
|
its a new "budget" card?
w00t
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
not budget. almost everything ATi does, nvidia copies, or the other way around sometimes. in this case, ATi has the X300 series, X600 series, and X800 series.....nvidia has a 6800(equal to x800) and now they are releasing a 6600(which will probably be equal to the x600, but im not sure)
however, it will probably be better than the x600 because it is being released later than the x600. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
|
It is better than the X600XT, usually by a wide margin. ATI are releasing a X700 to keep up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 996
|
the 6600gt is sometimes even better than the x800, its just amazing how nvidia is outpacing ati right now, im so proud of my 2 companies, AMD and nvidia, takin over the board once again :-P
KoMoDo |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
lol 2 companies eh? my 2 are intel and ATi(i used to be nvidia though)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 996
|
ya, dont wanna start the flame wars but this is how i think of it
cheap(u cant argue about that) and good vs expensive and a little worse. :-P KoMoDo |
|
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Actually Komodo I'd like to see where you read that. Every benchmark I see tells me the same thing: the x800 is still the king of the vid cards when you start turning the details on like AA AF. The 6800 GT kan keep up with it at some points, but in general the x800 just does better. There is no way the 6600 could benchmark better _in general_ than the x800. Better than the x600XT, probably yes, the x800, no.
Besides, there is no such thing as "a company taking over the board". AMD and Intel are both good, they both excel at different aspects. ATi and nVidia are both good, and they also excel in different aspects. |
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 996
|
yes, i agree with that, im not saying its taken over the board, well at least i didnt mean that :-P i mean that all the statistics and diagrams show that amd is selling more cpu's than intel, and it said that the forecast for AMD to dominate the desktop side of things will be 2017 :-P
and umm, didnt u see all the latest games' benchmarks? like doom 3 and HL2, u could definetely see the 6800 dominate the x800 in fps's. and about the 6600gt better than the x800, if u haven't noticed, i only said that what was in "some" cases, not all, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
the 6800 dominates because Doom3 was made on nvidia cards, so the performance is fine tuned. if you get the new ati drivers(4.8) then it should be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 | |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|