Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-23-2004, 09:00 AM   #1
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California, Bay Area/Silicon Valley
Posts: 150
Low Latency vs. Bandwidth

I already know that tighter memory timings will yield better performance than higher memory bandwith, especially on AMD 64 machines. My question is slightly different. Let say hypothetically I'm going to overclock my Memory to 250 mhz and would like to keep the timings down as low as possible. Would it be more advantageous to buy RAM that already runs at 250 Mhz and just try to tighten the timings (Corsair XMS4000Pro 3-4-4-8), or would it be better to purchase RAM that runs at a lower frequency, say PC3500 and has very low latencies (Corsair XMS3500 XLPro 2-2-2-5) and up the voltage and overclock to 250 MHz?
Uber_Gamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2004, 10:36 AM   #2
Tin
Stereo junkie
 
Tin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Just North of Fort Pontchartrain du Détroit
Posts: 3,402
Send a message via AIM to Tin
AMD 64s are not affected greatly by higher latencies. since AMD 64 has an integrated memory controller, low latency memory doesnt yield the performance differences seen with AMD XP machines. the differences between high and low latency memory for AMD 64 is nothing more than miniscule....something that runs 2-2-2-5 will not perform much better than 3-4-4-8 modules. AMD 64 loves sticks with Hynix D43, Hynix D5, and Micron mT -5bC. the mT -5bC are the chips found on the OCZ Enhanced Bandwidth series memory....qand should run at 3-2-2-7 @ 250FSB with a reasonable amount of voltage.
__________________
Join the 1%, use Linux
Tin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2004, 07:30 PM   #3
Member (5 bit)
 
deeppow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 28
My advice is simple, listen to the Tinman he knows what he is talking about.
deeppow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2004, 09:25 PM   #4
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California, Bay Area/Silicon Valley
Posts: 150
That's interesting Tin. I read an article that said since the AMD 64 is so dependent/focused on memory that the tight timings will give a bigger performance boost than sacrificing them for a slightly higher speed. I'll take your word for it though. Anyway my question is...
Will two sticks of memory with the same chips but rated for different speed perform the same?
(ex. OCZ Low Latency PC3200 vs. a Low Latency PC3700 - As they have same chips but are at different speeds: PC3200, PC3700)
And I understand that there is variation in which chips are used in certain models and I should handpick them at a store, but where can I get the basic information about which sticks have which chips so I have something to work off of before I go to a store?

Last edited by Uber_Gamer; 09-23-2004 at 09:30 PM.
Uber_Gamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2