|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
02-20-2005, 08:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 415
|
64 bit Intel Processor? Its true, supposedly
|
|
|
|
02-21-2005, 03:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
|
I'm anxious to see the 64-bit reviews.
 
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2005, 07:10 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
it's highly dissappointing as the A64s still win
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
02-21-2005, 07:14 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Its the Dark Side!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,111
 |
Some say that intel is waiting for 64-bit to evolve a little bit. Like until more 64-bit optimized programs and OS'es come out. Whether is a good business strategy against AMD or not, im not too sure.
CN 
__________________
CN
|
||
|
|
|
|
02-21-2005, 07:34 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 130
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2005, 08:05 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 193
|
i just want one of thoses dual core processors they are making
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 12:31 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Quote:
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 12:49 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Liquid Lemur Staff Artist
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, MS
Posts: 664
  |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 12:54 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
|
Quote:
 . I'm very enthusiastic about how these new EM64T enabled Intel P4s would do. Hopefully, it alleviated the problems that are associated with the original Prescotts.kram
__________________
"For today, goodbye. For tomorrow, good luck. And forever, Go Blue!"
University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman |
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 01:16 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Quote:
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 01:42 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Liquid Lemur Staff Artist
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, MS
Posts: 664
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2005, 05:24 PM
|
#12 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
|
Well, if you guys want another point of view, here are some more benchmarks:
Toms Crappy Hardware Hot Hardware Tech Report FiringSquad Anandtech Intel will need more than upping their FSB and L2 caches to overtake the Athlon 64. The Athlon 64 is just a superior architecture than what Intel has currently (only personal thoughts). That's why I wonder why some review sites don't include all the benchmarks (the only ones that did san extensive review were Techreport and Anandtech), maybe, they don't want to ashame Intel (well, they already are), that's why they only focus on audio/video ancoding and some synthetic benchmarks. I just hope AMD release their E stepping with SSE3 and 2MB cache to embarass Intel a lot more (only personal thoughts).
Last edited by Avenger; 02-22-2005 at 05:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
