|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
|
Building a First Linux Machine
Hi. I have never used Linux but want to build my own Linux machine and learn to use it. I am hoping to build a budget machine and am looking at buying:
ASUSU P4V8X-X Intel Celeron 2.53 GHz 256Mg RAM 40Gb SATA Drive Will these components get me a decent machine or do I want to spend some extra money for a bit more kick? (This motherboard will allow my to upgrade the processor in the future if necessary). Will there be a large/noticable performance difference in having better components? Thanks, Ken Last edited by kenm_uk; 03-23-2005 at 12:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,467
|
I recommend you use an Intel chipset motherboard - it's going to be a lot more stable than a Via chipset with an Intel processor. Not only that, but the P4V8X-X is not Prescott compatible, and putting an 800 FSB Northwood processor in it is overclocking the chipset. See if you can find a P4P800S-X board, here in the US they are only about $15 more than that Via board and will be upgradeable to 800 FSB and Prescott without running it out of specs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
|
GLC,
Thanks for your reply. I am not sure I understand exactly what you wrote. On http://uk.asus.com/prog/spec.asp?m=P4V8X-X&langs=11 I read that motherboard is Prescott FSB 533MHx compatible and the Intel Celeron is FSB533. Are you saying that by buying a different board will leave me room to move up to a 800FSB processor in the future? Did I miss something else in your comment? Also, you said that an Intel chipset is more stable than a VIA. Why is that? When looking at CPUs and motherboards, what features of a chipset do I need to be considering? Many thanks, Ken |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,467
|
Quote:
There is nothing more stable than an Intel chipset for Intel processors. Leave VIA for the AMD folks. For Intel processors, VIA is a low priced alternative that just does not work as well. Intel does not share critical technology issues with VIA because VIA will not pay Intel for a license. AMD shares with VIA because AMD is not in the chipset business. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|