|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 154
|
64k cluster question
I have a HTPC that has been up and running for some time now. I have a 250 gig Sata HD partitioned with 20gigs to the OS and 230gigs to media as a NTFS. I have heard that if the HD is formatted to 64k clusters it runs faster. How do I check what my cluster size is? I don't remember what I did when I was partitioning my HD.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,018
|
You can run CHKDSK to see the cluster size.
You'll see a line like: 4096 bytes in each allocation unit The Default Cluster Size for the NTFS and FAT File Systems http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;314878 "The smaller the cluster size, the more efficiently your disk stores information."
__________________
Stand Up 2 Cancer - SU2C |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
64K might load large files unperceivable faster, but just think of all those 1k cookies when you're browsing.... you still have to read a 64k cluster. The benifits of storing more data, as EzyStvy mentions, outweights any factional performance gains: you can save 16 small files in 4K clusters to match just one file in a 64K cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 154
|
thanks for the replies guys, I think I'll just keep it teh way it is then.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|