|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
08-02-2005, 11:00 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 76
|
x2 3800 vs 3700 san diego
If price was no object , which would you choose? The 3700 san diego is clocked higher then the x2 3800 (x3800 is really a 3200 for single threaded apps). The 3700 overclocks real well , in comparison the x2 3800 may or may not overclock as high but has a second core. For games , the 3700 is faster right now , but would the x2 3800 be fast enough for todays games and a better choice seeing that it will support multithreaded games later? Which is the better choice?
|
|
|
|
08-03-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 487
|
Well what are you going to use it for? The 3700 is much better for games and the X2 is better for multi-tasking. Multi-Threaded games may never exist and if they do, they're a long way off, by which time the X2 will be old.
|
|
|
|
|
08-03-2005, 02:54 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 76
|
Good point Ror , I think I'll go with the 3700 san diego. Price is going to be 270 for retail very soon.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
