|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: cleveland,ohio
Posts: 101
|
scanner
hi every one
i am looking to get a new scanner,ive looked at hp5300 & cannon s600 , could use some advice |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,654
|
I would suggest that you sve yourself a lot of money and get a Mustek UB from wal-mart for $59.00. been useing one over two years now and does a great job on photos and everything else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Modesto,Calif
Posts: 4,042
|
Avery, seems I just read about scanners somewhere here, but it seems that it isn't the brand of scanner but the software you use. I have a UMAX 2000p and it works great; even with the software that came with it.
Software quality can make or break it. Carl |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: cleveland,ohio
Posts: 101
|
scanner
hi carl
its strange that you would say that,the reason being its the very thing a friend is telling me , maybe i should listen and pay attention to the software i am getting,i welcome all the imput i can get, maybe i will learn in the process thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
You can't beat an HP for ease of use and quality. Their scanner driver is the most user friendly out there. Agreed on the software - until you get into high end scanners, the software they all come with is pretty basic. Just stick with USB or SCSI - parallel port scanners are dog slow and tie up the port.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
|
It really just depends on why you want a scanner. I just bought an Astra 6400 Firewire scanner. It is quite fast but a bit more expensive than some of it's USB cousins. I do quite a bit of scanning so speed and image quality are essential. Software is a big part of what you pay for in a scanner. My last scanner was a Microtek SCSI scanner. It came with a full version of Photoshop 5.0. The scanner cost $300 but if I had to buy Photoshop, it would have cost me $600. Go figure.
You don't say what OS you are using. Windows 2000 can be more picky about scanners than Windows 98. I couldn't get my Firewire scanner to work at all in Windows 2000. I think because I installed the scanner first and not the software. After an unrelated format and re-install, it works perfectly.
__________________
Want to Make $$$$ with your Computer? No Risk! Simply press shift-4 four times in a row |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: cleveland,ohio
Posts: 101
|
scanner
hi mairving
i,m using win me os, the 30 bit acer i am using is very slow and pictures i do are poor, i do not do alot of photos it is connected parallel |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
|
Re: scanner
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|