|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
~ Ryan ~
|
Which would you pick?
I am thinking about getting a WD Raptor 10K SATA drive.
I plan to put only the OS, and the game files of the games I play frequently on it. Would you get the 36.7GB or the 74GB drive? I know it will boil down to the necessity of HDD space (for me), but I would just like to see what some of you would do in my case. When I get either of those two, I will then RAID 1 my two 300GB Seagate 7.2k HDDs and store everything else one it, like music, school work, videos, and pictures to ensure that I have better fault tolerance and I don't easily lose some important documents and family photos. I am also open to other suggestions, but I have always wanted a Raptor drive, and when I built this PC, I made the stupid mistake of getting 2 300 GB HDDs when I should have gotten one Raptor and one 300GB. TIA, Ryan
__________________
RiotCats.com, an internet domain specifically fabricated and visually erected for the appreciation of the feline kingdom! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,509
|
How much space do your OS and games need? If it isn't anywhere near 36.7Gb and you don't anticipate adding a lot more to it, there isn't any real reason to get the 74Gb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
|
Get the 74. Trust me, I just went through this. I started with a 36 when I built, saying "that will be MORE than enough". Right. It filled up faster than I ever thought. With the new games coming out, they just keep increasing in size. You won't regret buying the bigger drive. In my case, I ended up making out all right. I sold my 36 on eBay for $5 more than I paid for it.
![]()
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
~ Ryan ~
|
But remember, I still will have 300GB more is 7.2k 8MB Cache Seagate drives for the rest of my files. I might consider getting the 36.7GB one soon, and then if I fill it up, add another one. That would be more expensive, but more drives means that it is easier to defrag and that I can more specifically store data on certain partitions and certain drives.
For 115$, that is still quite an expensive price for something that I really don't need on account of the 500GB of space I still have available right now. So, I might just hold onto the idea for a little longer before deciding to purchase. Thanks for the suggestions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
I don't know if this is still the case, but when the 74gb Raptor came out, it was measurably faster than the 36gb Raptor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
~ Ryan ~
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
As far as defragging ryan, I'm willing to wager that there would be VERY little difference in the time it took to defrag a single 74Gb, and two 36Gb's in RAID configuration. You can also set up various partitions on the same drive to accomplish what you seek. I guess I'm telling you this all based on my experience in having just done the same thing. Long term, a single 74Gb will cause less headaches than trying to RAID two together to obtain the same storage level. JMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
~ Ryan ~
|
Thank guys, it will be the 74 GB one then, seems like it is faster.
I just have to wait till I know when I am headed back to the US or Canada or order it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|