Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-12-2006, 12:06 PM   #1
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
Which would you pick?

I am thinking about getting a WD Raptor 10K SATA drive.
I plan to put only the OS, and the game files of the games I play frequently on it.

Would you get the 36.7GB or the 74GB drive?

I know it will boil down to the necessity of HDD space (for me), but I would just like to see what some of you would do in my case.

When I get either of those two, I will then RAID 1 my two 300GB Seagate 7.2k HDDs and store everything else one it, like music, school work, videos, and pictures to ensure that I have better fault tolerance and I don't easily lose some important documents and family photos.

I am also open to other suggestions, but I have always wanted a Raptor drive, and when I built this PC, I made the stupid mistake of getting 2 300 GB HDDs when I should have gotten one Raptor and one 300GB.

TIA,
Ryan
__________________
RiotCats.com, an internet domain specifically fabricated and visually erected for the appreciation of the feline kingdom!
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:16 PM   #2
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,509
How much space do your OS and games need? If it isn't anywhere near 36.7Gb and you don't anticipate adding a lot more to it, there isn't any real reason to get the 74Gb.
jayb1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:25 PM   #3
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
Get the 74. Trust me, I just went through this. I started with a 36 when I built, saying "that will be MORE than enough". Right. It filled up faster than I ever thought. With the new games coming out, they just keep increasing in size. You won't regret buying the bigger drive. In my case, I ended up making out all right. I sold my 36 on eBay for $5 more than I paid for it.
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:37 PM   #4
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
But remember, I still will have 300GB more is 7.2k 8MB Cache Seagate drives for the rest of my files. I might consider getting the 36.7GB one soon, and then if I fill it up, add another one. That would be more expensive, but more drives means that it is easier to defrag and that I can more specifically store data on certain partitions and certain drives.

For 115$, that is still quite an expensive price for something that I really don't need on account of the 500GB of space I still have available right now. So, I might just hold onto the idea for a little longer before deciding to purchase.

Thanks for the suggestions.
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:43 PM   #5
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
I don't know if this is still the case, but when the 74gb Raptor came out, it was measurably faster than the 36gb Raptor.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 12:47 PM   #6
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
I don't know if this is still the case, but when the 74gb Raptor came out, it was measurably faster than the 36gb Raptor.
Thanks GLC, I will do some searching to see if that is still true. If so, then I will be buying the 74GB flavour.
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 05:00 PM   #7
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc
I don't know if this is still the case, but when the 74gb Raptor came out, it was measurably faster than the 36gb Raptor.
Yes, it is still true. Look around on the net for the reviews of the latest 150 Gb Raptor. There are comparisons of the whole family. Both of the major firmware revisions of the 74 Gb are faster than the 36 Gb Raptor.

As far as defragging ryan, I'm willing to wager that there would be VERY little difference in the time it took to defrag a single 74Gb, and two 36Gb's in RAID configuration. You can also set up various partitions on the same drive to accomplish what you seek. I guess I'm telling you this all based on my experience in having just done the same thing. Long term, a single 74Gb will cause less headaches than trying to RAID two together to obtain the same storage level. JMO.
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 05:04 AM   #8
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
Thank guys, it will be the 74 GB one then, seems like it is faster.

I just have to wait till I know when I am headed back to the US or Canada or order it.
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0