Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-22-2001, 11:36 AM   #1
Member (13 bit)
 
Floppyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,791
Cool Seagate X15-36lp vs. 2x 36xl

Hey all,

I'm planning on going SCSI for my next system and have mostly everything picked out but hdd. What would be better to get?

The new Seagate Cheetah 15,000rpm x15-36lp drive 18.4 gig with 8mb of cache, (benches at over 60mb's at the beginning of the drive)

OR

The Seagate Cheetah 10,000rpm 36xl 18.4 gig with 4mb's of cache (I will get two of these eventually, the cost of of 2 of these is close to that of the 15k drive). Benches at over 40mb's at the beginning of the drive)

What do you guys think? I kinda think 2x 18.4 gig 10k drives would be better, not only would they be quieter, but it's also more space. Plus I think I really don't run anything that would really take advantage of a 15k drive, that's that fast. Thanks for your opinions.
Floppyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 10:46 AM   #2
Member (11 bit)
 
Carl Price's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 1,828
I have had seven Seagate failures this month. They have joined the list of drives I won't use along with WD and Quantum bigfoot.

Failures have not been SCSI tho. I believe that almost all manufacturers make SCSI equipment more robust than IDE.
__________________
Carl
Have you noticed? Despite the high cost of living it is still the most popular option available.

Integrity is it's own reward!

The rarest animal in the world is a liberal using his own money. It is easy to be a liberal when the result of your politics still leaves you very well-off. Try letting all that spending hurt and you'll see how many folks are for it!
Carl Price is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2001, 05:56 PM   #3
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,769
Carl: Go figure - the only SCSI drives we have NOT had issues with are Seagate and WD.........can't say the same about IBM, Quantum, and Fujitsu. The only IDE drives that have treated us well are IBM and Fujitsu.
glc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2001, 09:05 AM   #4
Member (13 bit)
 
Toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Now in Phoenix, AZ. Where next? Only 8 states left to see.
Posts: 4,661
This is from the "what its worth department",
I am not a seagate fan. However, their SCSI stuff does seem to be better then thier IDE stuff. Still, i`m from the "old school" and have a warm fuzzy spot in my soul for Seagate full hight SCSI stuff.
Still, a 15k/RPM drive would tend to scare me to some degree as Seagate 10k drives run quite warm.
The key to long lived SCSI drives is cooling, cooling, cooling regardless of drive manufacture. Keep a SCSI drive cool and the world is right.
Seagate drives have a nasty little habit of developing "sticktion" after running near recommended temps. This is where the drive head/platters locally "stick" preventing the drive from spinning up.
Thier full hight stuff is bullet proof. I have 6 of their 23GB ultra-wide full hight drives running 24/7 for 3 years now. Tuff, fast and reasonably quiet.
__________________
2 goldfish were discussing Mythology.
The discussion ended when a goldfish replied:
"There MUST be a God, who changes the water?"
Toaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2