Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-21-2006, 03:50 PM   #1
Member (5 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 23
Help with HDD Terminology

I'm looking to add 2nd drive to ~4yo Dell P4/2.4GHz/160GB existing drive and 512 RAM. Mainly want to have dual boot to Linux on #2. The Mobo supports IDE but when I'm shopping on-line I don't understand all the numbers/letters quoted in various units. I understand obviously the drive size, SATA v. IDE, rotation speed and buffer size but what about ATA 100 v. ATA 133 or "8ms RoHS" v. "8.9ms FDB" (search times?).

Just don't want to make some dumb error & have an incompatible drive.
Thanks

(by the way, additional thanks to those who helped on my FIRST ever build a month ago which went extremely well--all started up with 1st button push and has hardly been off since!)
__________________
ASUS8NE; AMD 3700; GeForce 6800; WD Sata 250GB; LiteOn CD/DVD; Corsair Value Select 1G RAM
flyingsolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 03:56 PM   #2
Professional gadfly
 
doctorgonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,364
Send a message via MSN to doctorgonzo
ATA133 is very slightly faster than ATA100. Since sustained transfer speeds (as opposed to burst transfer speeds from the drive cache) are nowhere need maxing out either ATA133 or ATA100's bandwidth, there is very little difference between the two.

As for the other stats, I ignore them. They simply don't matter much, and the only way you could tell the difference between two drives with different search speeds is by using benchmarking software, if at all.

The big things that matter: spindle rotation speed (higher is better), cache (more is better), capacity (ditto), and interface (SATA vs. PATA).
doctorgonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 04:14 PM   #3
Member (5 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 23
Thanks--I sort of suspected that was the case. One more small thing, is there any reason to expect any limitation on the size of the drive my system would recognize/accomodate and how would I tell? (I expect to look at 200 to 300 GB drives)
flyingsolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 04:39 PM   #4
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
If it's running a 160 now, the sky is the limit. 137gb is the bios break point.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0