Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-22-2006, 08:35 AM   #1
Member (7 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 70
Send a message via ICQ to Dustmann Send a message via AIM to Dustmann Send a message via MSN to Dustmann Send a message via Yahoo to Dustmann
Raid 0 - how many disks to optimize performance?

I am interested in setting up a raid 0 array with sata drives, and wonder what the performance increase would be with 3 or more drives? Theoretically adding more drives should improve performance, but is there a difference between an array of 2 or an array of 3+? I've been using a raid0 setup with 2 ata100 drives for a couple of years, and am upgrading soon. Also, I'm not worried about data safety, I have seperate drives that I store all of my important data on. The drives would store mainly the OS and games.

I'm thinking about either doing a setup with 2x 120/160gb drives or something like 4x 40/80gb drives. Is striping data across more drives going to actually slow down performance? And should I stick with even numbers or would 3 or 5 be ok (my mobo only has 4 ports)? Does anyone know of any charts or benchmarks relating to this?

Last edited by Dustmann; 03-22-2006 at 08:49 AM.
Dustmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 08:59 AM   #2
Ride 'em Cowboy
 
EzyStvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,018
Raid O must be done in pairs with identical size drives.

Generally speaking, there is a point of diminishing returns. Going with 4 drives would be going past this point.
__________________
Stand Up 2 Cancer - SU2C
EzyStvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 09:35 AM   #3
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
Actually you can have a 3 drive RAID 0 - drives should be identical. If they aren't, each drive will be reduced to the capacity of the smallest drive. It's also somewhat sensitive to differences in the drive manufacturers, etc. so ideally the drives should be identical models, down to exact same firmware. There will be no performance increase with anything more than 2 drives as far as I know.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2006, 09:41 AM   #4
Professional gadfly
 
doctorgonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,364
Send a message via MSN to doctorgonzo
Yes, theoretically you can increase total bandwidth linearly by having more drives. It depends totally on the drive controller, though. I'm not sure about this, but I'm guessing the onboard RAID controllers on most consumer-level motherboards won't be able to handle more than two disks. Also, at some point you are going to overwhelm the total bandwidth available on the bus, be it PCI or PCI Express or HT.

At the same time, increasing the number of drives in the array will also increase the chance of the array being destroyed due to drive failure. I wouldn't even put an OS on a RAID 0 array unless it was totally backed up at least weekly.
doctorgonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0