|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
11-15-2006, 04:09 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
|
intel 45mm quad cores
i know intel 45mm quads cores are shipping the second half of 2007 but what are the chances that it will be introduced with a new socket and support ddr3?
any ideas? |
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 05:09 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 185
 |
I'm pretty sure they'll support ddr3, but I don't have a good guess as to if intel will release a new socket.
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 05:28 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
|
although i really want a new computer i think it is gonna have to wait a year. cuz i need to buy new irons for golf which are like 500 so i think im gonna go with a ps3 or wii this year and a comp next year so this is good info
Last edited by dogdude16; 11-15-2006 at 05:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 05:51 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 286
|
I heard Rumors that people (Probably in Japan) Were getting 2000.00 dollars for the PS3.
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 06:20 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
|
yeah i wouldn't buy one at launch it be in january
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2006, 10:25 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 670
|
Speaking of "QUAD CORE" how much is this gonna cost?
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 02:57 PM
|
#7 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
The 45nm ones? or the current one?
The current one costs $1000. the 45nm ones - well, they aren't out yet.
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers." |
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 03:01 PM
|
#8 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 37.239°N , 115.816°W
Posts: 391
|
whats the current manufacturing process?
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 03:02 PM
|
#9 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
65nm.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 08:49 PM
|
#10 |
|
Not so new
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland, United States
Posts: 2,576
|
So what does the 65nm mean?
__________________
“To me there are three things everyone should do every day. Number one is laugh. Number two is think -- spend some time in thought. Number three, you should have your emotions move you to tears. If you laugh, think and cry, that's a heck of a day.” - Jim Valvano |
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 09:15 PM
|
#11 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
I believe that's basically the smallest width of the components that make up the CPU are. For example, 65nm process has transistors that are 65nm wide...I did a little research to back this up:
http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/moore.ars/2 They call it the smallest "feature" size that can be created. |
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 09:17 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Kickin' it
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 7,723
|
Quote:
http://www.intel.com/technology/sili...nm_silicon.htm
__________________
Fold for PCMech: Team 13761 |
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 09:22 PM
|
#13 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Also, I believe, the smaller the transistors are - the less voltage they require...lowering power usage and still cramming the same number of transistors into the same area without a large power consumption jump.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2006, 09:27 PM
|
#14 |
|
Not so new
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland, United States
Posts: 2,576
|
Wow thanks for taking time to research that Alaron and Blue... I appreciate it. Those transistors are small!!!
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2006, 09:23 AM
|
#15 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,767
|
This also generally results in less heat. I hear the 65nm quad cores are real furnaces.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 08:52 AM
|
#16 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 37.239°N , 115.816°W
Posts: 391
|
GLC, didn't intel make quad cores the same way they made their first dual cores, by putting (in this case) two C2D chips together, because i think thats why they run hot.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 09:09 AM
|
#17 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,767
|
Yep.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 10:10 AM
|
#18 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
A Core 2 Duo is rated at around 65W,Kentsfield (Core 2 Quad) is rated for double that, 130W - that's the same as what old Intel Pentium D EE CPU's were.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 11:03 AM
|
#19 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
|
just wait for the new redesigned quad cores and ddr3
 i cant wait
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how to remove screen setting menu | sulochana | Home Theater, Audio, and Video | 0 | 03-08-2005 01:58 AM |
| Intel System Ordered, Pretty Cool Stuff | IronMentality | Computer Hardware | 2 | 01-21-2005 06:36 AM |
| Intel Or Amd | EvErY_DaY | Computer Hardware | 40 | 10-26-2003 02:48 AM |
| AMD rig vs INTEL rig | treymills | Computer Hardware | 17 | 07-25-2003 06:40 PM |
| best processor? | bhome83 | Computer Hardware | 126 | 11-15-2001 04:53 AM |
Linear Mode
