|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hello
I Installed my 4x128meg PC100 168pin DIMM-Hyundai Double sided today woweee so far ok, Im concerned about the test I did today reads as follows WARNING Adjust file cache This system may encounter a Windows bug that causes spurious and incorrect "Not enough memory available to run this program" messages to appear, even though it has 512MB of memory installed Windows Configuration Description Your Results Common Name Windows 98 Full Version Windows 98 4.10.1998 First Install Fri May 4 2001 Free Resources 81% Fonts Installed 48 Windows Scripting Version 5.1.0.4615 CPU Load 1% MaxPhysPage Limit No Limit Min File Cache None Max File Cache None Swap File Status Enabled Min Swap File None Max Swap File None Processor Description Your Results Brand/Model Intel Pentium II with MMX Nominal Clock Speed 350 MHz Measured Clock Speed 361 MHz External Clock Speed 66 MHz CPUID Information 0x0651 0x183F9FF CPU Load 1% Level 1 Cache 32 KB Level 2 Cache 512 KB Speed Rating 1044 (106% of 22115 similar) Memory Configuration Description Results RAM installed 512 MB Windows RAM 512 MB Total RAM slots 4 Available RAM slots 0 Max RAM module size 128 MB Memory Type |DIMM|SDRAM| Level 1 Cache 32 KB Level 2 Cache 512 KB Chipset Intel 82443BX Speed Rating 607 MB/s (104% of 22115 similar) Disk Drive Letters These are drive letters associated with hard disk drives. This list does not include drive letters for floppy disks or other removable media such as CD-ROM, DVD, Zip or Jaz drives. Description Drive C Partition format FAT32 Cluster size 4 KB Drive label DRIVE_C Size 6184 MB Free space 4868 MB (79%) Drive health OK Last scan Tue Sep 4 +1000 2001 Data fragmentation 1% File fragmentation 1% Last defrag Tue Sep 4 +1000 2001 Junk files 100 MB (2%) Cached speed 70.85 MB/s (114%) Uncached speed 1.91 MB/s (90%) Would appreciate some help Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, England
Posts: 183
|
Still works doesn't it?
well leave it well alone until something actually goes wrong with it and then worry about it... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
yeah rite
No need to shout TdM |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, England
Posts: 183
|
Sorry man bad morning I'm calm now....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Now in Phoenix, AZ. Where next? Only 8 states left to see.
Posts: 4,661
|
Edit the system.ini file and look for the following entry in the 386enh section.
Maxfilecache=xxx Minfilecache=xxx If either do not exist, you may wish to enter the following: (these values MUST appear in the 386enh section, if you do NOT see such a section, do nothing) Maxfilecache=10240 (this number represents 10MB) Minfilecache=3072 (again, in MB) The Maxfilecache value is the largest file cache the O/S will set-up. The Minfilecache is the smallest the O/S will use. What you should do: Remove 256MB leaving 256MB. Micky$oft can't use efficiently amounts in excess of 256MB.
__________________
2 goldfish were discussing Mythology. The discussion ended when a goldfish replied: "There MUST be a God, who changes the water?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,767
|
Windows can use 512 mb before running into Vcache problems.
You might want to read this thread. http://forum.pcmech.com/showthread.php?threadid=13535 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
System INI
Hi Peoples
So What reads in the article and from microsoft is that I can accur problems if ram is higher than 512 etc but since I have 512 should be ok change settings only if I get warnings. glc what do you suggest to in file cache. Thanks for all the suggestions I copied and pasted from my System INI [boot] oemfonts.fon=vgaoem.fon system.drv=system.drv drivers=mmsystem.dll power.drv shell=Explorer.exe user.exe=user.exe gdi.exe=gdi.exe sound.drv=mmsound.drv dibeng.drv=dibeng.dll comm.drv=comm.drv mouse.drv=mouse.drv keyboard.drv=keyboard.drv *DisplayFallback=0 fonts.fon=vgasys.fon fixedfon.fon=vgafix.fon 386Grabber=vgafull.3gr display.drv=pnpdrvr.drv [keyboard] keyboard.dll= oemansi.bin= subtype= type=4 [boot.description] system.drv=Standard PC keyboard.typ=Standard 101/102-Key or Microsoft Natural Keyboard mouse.drv=Standard mouse aspect=100,96,96 display.drv=Intel740 Win9x PV4.0 [386Enh] ebios=*ebios woafont=dosapp.fon mouse=*vmouse, msmouse.vxd device=*dynapage device=*vcd device=*vpd device=*int13 keyboard=*vkd display=*vdd,*vflatd [NonWindowsApp] TTInitialSizes=4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 22 [power.drv] [drivers] msvideo=gfxnull.drv wavemapper=*.drv MSACM.imaadpcm=*.acm MSACM.msadpcm=*.acm wave=mmsystem.dll midi=mmsystem.dll [iccvid.drv] [mciseq.drv] [mci] cdaudio=mcicda.drv sequencer=mciseq.drv waveaudio=mciwave.drv avivideo=mciavi.drv videodisc=mcipionr.drv vcr=mcivisca.drv MPEGVideo=mciqtz.drv MPEGVideo2=mciqtz.drv [vcache] [MSNP32] [Display] [drivers32] msacm.lhacm=lhacm.acm msacm.msg723=msg723.acm vidc.M263=msh263.drv vidc.M261=msh261.drv VIDC.IV50=ir50_32.dll msacm.iac2=C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\IAC25_32.AX msacm.msaudio1=msaud32.acm VIDC.YUY2=ir41_32.ax VIDC.IV41=ir41_32.ax msacm.sl_anet=sl_anet.acm msacm.voxacm160=vct3216.acm msacm.l3acm=C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\L3CODECA.ACM vidc.CVID=iccvid.dll VIDC.IV31=ir32_32.dll VIDC.IV32=ir32_32.dll vidc.MSVC=msvidc32.dll VIDC.MRLE=msrle32.dll msacm.msg711=msg711.acm MSACM.imaadpcm=imaadp32.acm MSACM.msadpcm=msadp32.acm MSACM.msgsm610=msgsm32.acm MSACM.trspch=tssoft32.acm [TTFontDimenCache] 0 4=2 4 0 5=3 5 0 6=4 6 0 7=4 7 0 8=5 8 0 9=5 9 0 10=6 10 0 11=7 11 0 12=7 12 0 13=8 13 0 14=8 14 0 15=9 15 0 16=10 16 0 18=11 18 0 20=12 20 0 22=13 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 58
|
Go to run, sysedit, win.ini and on the next line below [vcache] enter
maxfilecache=xxxxx with the xxxx's equaling the total amount of space you want dedicated be sture to save the edited file and reboot your system |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 58
|
pardon me....it's sys.ini
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,767
|
I suggest you leave the file cache alone - and read the thread. You may want to use the suggestion in there for modifying the swapfile usage.
Dad: nope, it's system.ini and the MinFileCache and MaxFileCache entries are case sensitive if you choose to put them in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hi
Im not to sure about adjusting editing, glc you mentioned swapfile usage could you give instructions as to what to enter exactly. Thanks to all |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Philosophical Computing Nutcase
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 870
|
What version of windows are you running
win98 doesn't handle 512 MB too well. win98SE or ME are required to allow windows to handle this amount of memory effectively. Win98 is supposed to be able to handle but I do not know the appropriate settings. This is not supposed to be easy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reading, England
Posts: 183
|
I run 98SE with 512MB with no problems I've even had more in there on odd occasions and haven't run into any problems its seems to handle it reasonably well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Windows 98
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Philosophical Computing Nutcase
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 870
|
sportie
Micky has got you by the proverbials upgrade the OS to use all 4X128MB sticks to full advantage and without confusion. TDM I said you would need SE minimum to run that amount of memory without problems, Sporties build date (Full Version Windows 98 4.10.1998) tells us that it is windows 98 original version and therefore will have problems with that amount of memory. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hi
what I read in a article that glc suggested is that I may get warnings if I go above the 512 however does not say what windows version original etc Kraken can you specify as Im just a fairly new to all this !!!!!!!! So Are you talking about the file Cache or Swap file. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,767
|
In this thread on this forum (which I posted above) there is a post about setting the swapfile.
I quote from reboot's post......... Actually, I'm running a gig of RAM right now. Win98 "sees" it all, but will only cache 320 meg. You can (sort of) fool windows by adding a vcache line, but you don't need to. The vcache only applies if you get the errors described in the MS article, AND you have 512 or more. I have never recieved the error, so... Just add ConservativeSwapFileUseage=1 to the [386enh] section of system.ini and the swap file will never get used. I have YET to get past the ~500meg mark in RAM usage, (rendering graphics in) PSP, browsing, FTP, email, virus scan, and about 3 games going. My video card craps out long before the RAM gets used. I've even assigned a 1 meg cache to each of my com ports, and USB as well. I'm on XP just now, so I can't get you a screen shot of RAM/Swap usage, because XP will use (and cache) up to 4 gig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hello
Glc so Im going to take your advice and type in as shows in my system ini see were Ive added the line is that ok 386Enh] ebios=*ebios woafont=dosapp.fon mouse=*vmouse, msmouse.vxd device=*dynapage device=*vcd device=*vpd device=*int13 keyboard=*vkd display=*vdd,*vflatd ConservativeSwapfileUseage=1 Thanks for all the help |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
Why don't you disable Virtual Memory and see if your programs dip into your RAM all the way (Can you disable in XP?) You might get that 500+ RAM usage. I know some programs need VM but see if the programs you run do anyway. And save Outlook program as the last loaded program. VM is the wagon while RAM is the BMW anyway. Sportie: I would do a search like... "Intel 82443BX update", your chipset and see if there are any updates and all your hardware and stuff you added on later. On another note; I've heard having so many fonts intalled slows start up or system in general??? Can anyone confirm this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hello Jade
I havent flashed Bios, Upgraded chipsets, etc I cant seem to find any information on intel 82443BX the only info i can find is the i440BX!!!!!!! thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Philosophical Computing Nutcase
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 870
|
Sportie
The vcache line relates to read ahead optimisation to your hard drive. In effect if you specify read ahead optimisation (Min(Max) File Cache = 1024) MinFileCache relates to the minimum amount of memory that will be allocated to "read ahead" subroutinines in windows. MaxFileCache is the maxcimum that you allow for this process. Using the minFileCache of around 200 MB (thats megabytes) allows earlier windows versions to utilise the amount of memory available. On startup the PC wil read at least 200MB of what it thinks to be the next best thing into memory. 200MB yeah bull****. If you are running win98 and have 512MB of RAM then upgrade the OS as you have no need of the older bit. Win 98 is best suited to 128-256 MB of RAM optimised. To fully utilise the extra RAM as intended then you need an aware OS. 2000 or Linux (talk to me linux) is required to effectively use higher memory amounts. A Pentium processor is only effective with 64 MB of memory. Any more and it actually slows the system. We are well beyond these early systems but the truths remain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
Hello Kraken
I have Win 98 SE 4.10.2222A I upgraded last week. Thanks for the reply |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 9,138
|
Jade: GLC was quoting me above, so I'll answer.
In win98, I rarely get beyond ~500 meg of actual RAM use, no matter what I'm doing. I just don't have any programs that require it, and fully booted, I still have 92% free physical RAM (NOT "free resources") .In XP, there are no constraints on RAM useage (up to 4 gig) so all my RAM get's used. Either way, I have no swapfile useage in either OS, ever, period. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
|
I Upgraded to Win 98 SE last week as for the conservative-swapfile I Now got rid off since I have win SE, Xp is not coming out until October in au will consider either Xp or 2000.
Thanks reboot |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|