|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
04-13-2007, 06:24 PM
|
#1 |
|
Avanzato Tecnico
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,380
|
Why only 3.2GB Memory
I am very curious why Windows XP professional is limited to 3.2 GB memory. What is it intentional? Was it a design flaw? Was it design limitation?
XP X64 can use 16GB of memory, what is the difference? I hope this is the right place to ask this question.
__________________
Want to help cure Cancer and other Diseases? You easily can, all you need is your Computer, Find out how!
|
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 06:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2007, 08:56 PM
|
#3 |
|
Avanzato Tecnico
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,380
|
Excellent link Cricket. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some advice to future A64 overclockers. | Tin | Computer Hardware | 19 | 04-13-2006 08:37 AM |
| Not enough extended memory to run windows !!! | shoesup | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 1 | 03-08-2002 10:32 PM |
| Does WinXP eat memory? | lexi | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 1 | 02-25-2002 11:47 AM |
| Memory Upgrade Nightmare | bomac | Computer Hardware | 13 | 12-11-2001 12:07 PM |
| Memory Module prob | kellyrudnick | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 5 | 11-17-2001 11:07 AM |
Cricket
Linear Mode
