|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Somewhere in Malaysia...
Posts: 953
|
Which could be faster?
Well, is an AMD's K6-3 400MHz or a Pentium II 350MHz much better or faster? I heard that the K6-2 450 isn't much faster than the PII 350MHz, but not sure how does a K6-3 fare since I've also seen that in my auction site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
Wow... it's been a while, by if I remember right, the AMD were faster then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Yeah, I think the K6-3s were slightly faster...possibly because the L2 cache was on-chip and running at full speed instead of off-chip running at half speed like the early Pentium IIs.
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,239
|
I beleive it depended on the mobo used. I believe the K6-3 is a a socket 7 processor. That means the mobo used will most likley be only capable of 66fsb. Only a few of these board could run at 100fsb. Which would then make the K6-3 comparable to its p2 counter part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Quote:
Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Rockin'n Rollin' All Nite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 1,318
|
Memories are made of this
Quote:
Unless you had a "Super Skt7" board, then you had a 100mhz FSB to play with. As it happens I have a never used still in the box PCChips (aghhhhh) Super Skt7 board from a previous employment, and a K6-3 500 chip in a shell I picked up at the tip. Will be putting together in the near future as an historical remembrance. I have tested the shell and it boots, its in an old AT format and the PCChips (aghhh) board has both ATX format and AT power inputs. Old times eh! Back on Topic, if memory serves, back then Intel couldn't touch AMD for speed (or heat!!! hahahah). The K6-3 -450 walked all over the P3 500 (Slot1), and was supposed to be a generation behind being on the older socket 7design (Ah Skt7 the universal socket, remember when all cpus fitted in this!) I know I was lucky enough to have both. Here is a short read on the K6-3 http://www.karbosguide.com/hardware/module3e05.htm Deuce
__________________
When the wife leaves, the dog dies and they repo' the house........I'll still have my Athlon (even when the new build arrives) ------------------------------------------------ Soltek SL-75FRN-RL / 2x512Mb PNY DDR + 1x512mb Kingston Value/ 'BARTON' 2500+ / Leadtek 6600GS / Sony DVDRW DRU810/ 60Gb Maxtor (2mb cache) 7200rpm ata133/ WD 320JB on USB2 / Antec PlusView 1000AMG Metallic Gray File Server/ Antec TruePower 330W PSU / 19" WS Hanspree New York Monitor (kvm)/ Vista Ultimate NEW BUILD DONE GA-G33M-S2 / E6750 / 2x 1GB Elixir@800mhz DDR2 / 256mb 8600GTS / 500Gb Seagate 16mb cache 7200.10 sata / NEC 18x Label Flash DVD-RW sata / E-Cute Cube case with side and top windows / Thermaltake 500watt TWV ATX 2.2 / 19" WS Hanspree New York Monitor (kvm) / 4Mbs Cable soon to be 10Mbs thanks to a free upgrade from my ISP / XP Pro SP2. Last edited by kissfan; 06-03-2007 at 11:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which is Faster USB 2.0 Or Firewire? | Jester | Computer Hardware | 3 | 07-12-2005 01:35 PM |
| xp time faster than normal | mystvearn | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 10 | 07-07-2005 01:58 PM |
| raid0 or raid 0+1, faster? | handicapper2 | Computer Hardware | 9 | 10-22-2004 11:23 AM |
| Faster ISP? | babylon5guy | Networking & Online Security | 10 | 11-11-2003 02:13 PM |