|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
2 cores or 4?
I've been dying for an upgrade for awhile now, but I've been putting it off until Intel's price drops, since they've been so relatively close together. Well now it's apparently right around the corner. Next week, to be exact. This is a BIG upgrade for me; birthday present to myself.
Here's a chart with the expected prices. http://www.behardware.com/news/8654/...trimestre.html So here's what I want some opinions on. Core2 Q6600 - Quad core. Reasonable 2.4mhz clock speed. 2x4mb L2. FSB1066. versus Core2 E6850 - Equal price. 3.0mhz. 4mb L2. New faster FSB1333. Overclocking is not out of the question. I'm open to ideas with it - perhaps a cheaper FSB1333 dual core model OCed to perform, for example - but I'm a newbie with it, and I'd be pretty upset if I fried my new upgrade. So what's your opinion? Which will perform better? Which is most futureproof? Thanks.
__________________
-When life gives you lemons, squeeze them in your bitter fingers and throw them at the wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,018
|
Core 2 Duo vs Core 2 Quad
Nice Article Quote:
__________________
Stand Up 2 Cancer - SU2C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 219
|
I use AMD...lol...but anyway>
Well....still many programs do not gain from an Extra Core=lol but alot do..... If a program is made to use 1 core....and you have Dual Core and a single core of the same arcitecture, at the same speed, they will perform almost exactly the same. That is the same for the Dual vs. Quad match> a Core 2 Duo @ 3 Ghz of the same arcitecture as the Core 2 Quad @ 2.4 Ghz on a program limited to 1 core or 2 Cores...the C2D will outperform by far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 128
|
You will see better performance with the dual core unless you do some serious multitasking or if you use programs that can specifically handle more than 2 threads at once. If you plan on gaming, then the dual core should suffice. If you plan on gaming, ripping music, and burning a dvd all at the same time... then the quad would probably be a noticeable upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
It's just the first time I've seen the two varieties at the same price, so I thought it deserved some investigation.
But, everyone seems to agree that the dual core variety has more going for it. Now to find a motherboard that supports the faster FSB... Thanks all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Security Dude
Staff
|
I have to agree with what's been said above. Most people don't understand that just because you have X number of cores, does not necessarily mean better performance. When developing applications, programmers have to develop them to handle multi-cores. For instance, to multi-thread (send parallel tasks through the processor, one to each core) requires the programmer to direct what gets executed where by basically creating a map of directions in the program. Since the majority of folks are still on single cores, most programs are made to execute on one core.
Remember that computers are dumb - they can not be self aware. Just like the jump from 32 to 64 bit, people didn't recognise that just because you had 64 bit didn't mean you USED 64 bit. As I said, I think I would have to agree with the above. By the time there is a use for quad core, you'll be ready to upgrade to bigger and better things again. Hope the extra detail isn't unnecessary - just trying to help explain why its like that.
__________________
Tyler A. Thompson Small Business Networking Services Specialist tyler@derbydigital.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
Extra detail is always good, and I understand the reasoning. I was mainly curious as to whether folks thought multi-core support was really that far off. Based on everything I've been reading though, 2 faster cores does seems to be the way to go for awhile yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: west St.paul MN
Posts: 9
|
how do u know how many cores are supported by the program
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Member (9 bit)
|
These new processors look nice. Even nicer are their prices. It seems the only difference is the FSB, but is the E6750 supposed to be a dramatic improvement over the E6700?
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Security Dude
Staff
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
Usually, only high-end or professional applications explicitly state support, like professional video editing software.
Otherwise, for the most part, it's hit or miss and up to the hardware to decide what to do.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems getting temps on both cores! | hagatha | Computer Hardware | 4 | 01-13-2007 12:09 AM |
| intel 45mm quad cores | dogdude16 | Computer Hardware | 18 | 11-18-2006 12:03 PM |
| A64 cores | Winnipesaukee | Computer Hardware | 8 | 10-09-2005 04:33 PM |
| amd 64 cores? | jefisme | Computer Hardware | 1 | 07-06-2005 10:58 AM |
| amd dual cores. | mountainking | Computer Hardware | 17 | 04-24-2005 10:18 PM |