|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 134
|
c2d and ram
"DDR2 memory modules
Unlike the previous Pentium 4 and Pentium D design, the Core 2 technology sees a greater benefit from memory running synchronously with the Front Side Bus (FSB). This means that for the Conroe CPUs with FSB of 1066 MT/s, the ideal memory speed is PC2-4200. In some configurations, using PC2-5300 can actually decrease performance. Only when going to PC2-6400 is there a significant performance increase. While expensive DDR2 memory models with tighter timings do improve performance, the difference in real world games and applications is negligible." -from wiki ... really? 677mhz could decrease performance?? "On jobs requiring large amounts of memory access, the quad-core Core 2 processors can benefit significantly [38]from using PC2-8500 memory, which runs exactly twice as fast as the FSB; this is not an officially supported configuration, but a number of motherboards offer it." ... really? >.< Last edited by marine63; 07-20-2007 at 08:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 134
|
D: someone answer me D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Where'd you read that at? Do you have a link to the whole article? I'd like to read the rest of the set up and testing procedures...
I don't think the memory speed will make a noticable difference (either way) in every day usage. Sure benchmarks might show differences either way but you don't use benchmarks to surf the web or play games.
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 134
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_2_...memory_modules wiki
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=472 wiki's source i still want to know that im getting my money's worth -.- |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Corsair's DDR2-533 has 4-4-4-12 timings and the DDR2-667 has 5-5-5-15. Some of the tests the DDR2-667 comes out ahead. Some the DDR2-667 seems to be way behind which is wierd and I can't explain that. The Madshrimp's article does make the point that these are synthetic benchmarks and won't necessarily translate into real life performance.
I'd stick with DDR2-667 with the 1066 FSB C2D's and I would think DDR2-800 would be a logical step up for 1333 FSB C2D's (although DDR2-667 would work fine). I've usually seen DDR2-667 cheaper than DDR2-533 (only a few bucks), and memory's so cheap now DRR2-800 isn't a whole lot more than DDR2-667. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RAM slots | iwinulose | Build Your Own PC | 4 | 05-14-2007 01:56 PM |
| C2D 6320 vs C2D 6600 | stevek11290 | Computer Hardware | 4 | 05-04-2007 11:26 PM |
| New Hardware Trouble: C2D, SATA, and DC Ram | XTREEMMMAK | Build Your Own PC | 7 | 03-07-2007 02:29 PM |
| First Build (~$800 Low-End C2D Gamer?) | coreywhite | Build Your Own PC | 10 | 11-25-2006 08:57 AM |
| c2d first build, please be gentle. | flanimal | Build Your Own PC | 4 | 11-20-2006 09:33 AM |