|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
Opinions on Printers
Hey everyone. I was looking into gettting a new printer. The biggest thing I'm looking for is good print quality, and scan quality. Fax is a bonus, and so is the ability to print pictures. I already have a small little printer that's just for pictures anyway.
This is what I was looking at. Anyone have any experience with these, or opinions on them or others? http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=12804 http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=15651 http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=13371 http://www.shopping.hp.com/store/pro...C8187A%2523ABA Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
Shameless bump.
Anyone have an opinion here? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
|
I would recommend that you buy a separate printer and a separate scanner. The machines that include both generally don't last log and offer lower quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bristol England
Posts: 419
|
Like Delikios, I instincively prefer separates (just count the buttons on the first one - faaaar too many!), and I prefer Canon to HP. However, I'm not familiar with the models you are considering.
Despite what I just said, I currently use an HP deskjet 920c (which is OK but not great, 4 years old now, light use) and I recently aquired a Canoscan LIDE 600F, which I like a lot. HTH a bit, Chris Last edited by Chris in U.K.; 11-01-2007 at 05:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
Having a scanner and printer would be nice, but I don't think I can afford it, both money wise, and space wise. The convience of having a all in one would probably give me the most for what I have to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,382
|
I don't know how Canons are, but I have a newer HP all in one and I find that it is fairly bloated. I don't at all like how the included software was designed because it is all slow and lacking features.
__________________
TFH, paraphrased: the bultin brner wouldnt evn boot it a usb burner woud but ten it gaeve an eror after i typed teh prduct key. i dont no waht it was it was a missng file, i fergt waht ti was but ti loked imporant can any1 help PLZ?! Check out PCP! (that's PCProfiles in case you thought I was on angel dust) http://www.pcprofiles.com/p/hitchface |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
Yeah. I'm still trying to decide what to get.
And while I decide, I just get to save that money to spend on other things...lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
I finally kicked the inkjet habit and will never go back. I already have a cheap, serviceable scanner and I bought a HP Color Laserjet 2600n. It's a beast on my desk but never again will I get ripped off on ink and I can feed it cheap paper without affecting print quality.
Sorry, I know that's not helpful but I just had to say it. For the cheaper all-in-ones, I prefer HP Officejets - but yes, the software is a disaster. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,382
|
That was the other part I forgot...GLC got it but the thing does print quite well. All of my home photos look incredible on none too fancy photo paper. Of course, the printer only plays one part in that, but it counts. I'm using a Photosmart C3180 which I realize isn't the newest, but it is on par with todays stuff.
It does print well, but everything on the software end just seems to take longer and be far more complicated than it ever has to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Confluence of the Mississippi and Misouri Rivers
Posts: 1,242
|
I am surprised they dont have a copy machine that lets you use it as a network printer and a fax machine. I think that would be a nicer product for an office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Defenestrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC & NJ
Posts: 1,371
|
Out of those, I'd recommend the MP830.
I <3 Canon multifunctions. The ink is relatively cheap, and it has a dedicated black ink cart for text, so you don't go through the costlier photo-black cart as quickly. It's going to be beastly though. As for separate scanner and printer, I'm usually an advocate of separate machines, but I have had great experiences with Canon multifunctions.
__________________
ToolGuyd.com - My Tool Blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
|
I insist on the fact that multifunctions are very error prone machines. I would suggest a cannon as a printer preferably with many separate cheap inks, especially if you are planning to print photographs. HP printers are not bad but I have faced many times problems with their paper feeders especially after some time of use. Their inks are more expensive as well. I like HP scanners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
Anyone else have any opinions on AIO's?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| opinions on printers | homi1ife | Computer Hardware | 22 | 09-18-2007 10:07 PM |
| Printers: Laser Vs InkJet | Tribble | Computer Hardware | 12 | 08-26-2004 11:47 PM |
| Opinions on these printers | Nuclear Krusader | Computer Hardware | 9 | 11-22-2002 10:50 PM |
| Running multiple printers at the same time? | Mike Hawthorne | Computer Hardware | 1 | 10-16-2002 03:43 PM |
| One computer, two printers question | tiffany26 | Computer Hardware | 7 | 06-06-2002 05:33 AM |