|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tha No'th Shoah, Massachusetts
Posts: 14
|
RAID 1: Worth it?
Hey all,
I am building a computer and am reaching the home stretch. I have been toying with the idea of installing two Seagate barracuda es.2 250gb 32mb in a RAID 1 array. Now, considering this will just be a gaming computer, is this a worthwhile idea? My mobo has SATA 3, and I have a 700w psu, so the hardware concerns are minimal. Will the increase in speed be noticeable? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,554
|
RAID 1 is mirroring - the entire contents of the first drive will be mirrored onto the second for backup purposes. This will give you no speed increase. Have a look at this Wiki to understand some of the details
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID My advice? Don't do RAID at all for a standard gaming computer. The low speed increases given by RAID 0 are simply not worth the risk of data loss; if one drive, or your array fails, you've lost the data on both drives. If you want a backup solution, consider an external hard drive and backup software that will allow you to select specific files/folders to backup.
__________________
-FK- "Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw, The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die, We shall not sleep, though poppies grow, In Flanders fields." - John McCrae, May 1915 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
I also don't recommend the ES2 drives for a gaming computer. They are enterprise drives designed for data security, not speed. Get the Barracuda 7200.11 drives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,554
|
Wanted to add also that, if you do decide to ditch RAID, then you'll get more value for money out of a single, larger capacity drive. 500GB is in the 'sweet spot' right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,746
|
I would not bother using RAID 1 for a computer used just for gaming. If you lose where you were in a game, so what. You can always reload a game with relative ease and play from the beginning of the game back to the point you were before the drive crashed. If you have lots of games where you don't want to lose the places where you were at, then its pretty much a personal decision. I have RAID 1 because I have three operating systems loaded on the same HD that I would dread having to reload.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | Last edited by David M; 05-12-2008 at 06:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tha No'th Shoah, Massachusetts
Posts: 14
|
Thanks for the advice guys! It was not easy trying to find hard numbers or side by sides of RAID/Non-RAID systems, and a little experienced advice was what I wanted.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Roasted RAID Controller | delta013 | Computer Hardware | 2 | 01-12-2008 01:01 PM |
| Sata worth it? Raid 0 ? | ricbrooks2 | Computer Hardware | 3 | 01-20-2006 10:46 AM |
| MORE PROBLEMS!!!! RAID Driver help. | barch 88 | Computer Hardware | 1 | 04-27-2005 09:35 PM |
| Raid controller for A8N-SLI | David M | Windows Legacy Support (XP and earlier) | 3 | 03-29-2005 05:01 PM |
| RAID 0 Boot up Failure | MATTGQ | Computer Hardware | 4 | 02-01-2005 01:29 PM |