|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 687
|
Confusion about USB and firewire cables. Which is faster?
I recently got a lacie external harddrive and it has usb 2.0 cable connection as well as firewire. My laptop that I use it with only has one of those small firewire connectors, I think they're called mini firewire. Then I got the cable like shown in this page
When I connected the firewire cable to my laptop with the small end to laptop it seems to be trasnferring files slower than the usb. I thought firewire is supposed to be faster. Is that not the case?
__________________
I Like Jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
|
what brand of laptop u have?
type of OS? by the way, winxp sp2, makes firewire much slower, update to SP3, if you are on SP2. I found my thinkpad's firewire transfers files faster than USB by a factor of 2.
__________________
words to live by: others don't know, I know. others know, I know more. others know more, I excel. one shouldnt read this far; above, is meant as an encouragement, translated from a Chinese Proverb. "He who angers you conquers you." : Elizabeth Kenny Last edited by alfie2; 09-16-2009 at 04:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 687
|
Quote:
The laptop is Toshiba Satellite A215 with Vista which had all the updates. I am really puzzled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
Firewire400 is a bit slower than USB 2.0. Firewire800 is faster. (Note that you will not always quite get full speed due to overhead and whatnot)
Firewire400: 393.216 Mbit/s or 49.152 MB/s USB 2.0: 480 Mbit/s or 60 MB/s Firewire800: 786.432 Mbit/s or 98.304 MB/s Which lacie drive did you get? I suspect it only supports Firewire400.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
|
actually, I was comparing firewire400( 1394a ) with USB2.
in my experiences, firewire 400 is about twice as faster as USB2; the larger the files, the more noticeable the speed differences. yes I get about 50MB/s for firewire and USB2 gives me about 20-30MB/s. under Win VISTA, firewire400 is also slower, about 35-40MB/s___dont know why. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
|
what do u mean by impossible?
I should have written " about 50Mb/s", I round it up...if thats what you meant. but I am 100% sure that I am using firewire400( 1394a) and USB2, 'cause firewire800 uses a different type of wire and all my USB ports are USB2( the hard drive uses USB2)___its a brand new laptop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,466
|
USB 2 is THEORETICALLY faster than Firewire 400, but in the real world, Firewire is often faster. USB requires a lot more system overhead to run while Firewire is very efficient.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|