|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,108
|
XEON Server CPU's
I looked around for a "lay persons" guide but didn't find one.... I'm going to be ordering a pair of servers from the data center we use.
One machine will be a terminal server (65 users) and host our large accounting package. The other server will run Sybase and hold the data. Here are three of the many cpu's I can order. I first one is what I've order in the past. The 2nd 3rd are what our largest client uses. (they actually use two of the #2 machines as TS machines) Quote:
Thanks in advance for any thoughts and suggestions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,794
|
In my opinion, the "X" series is for performance optimization, hence the turbo boost etc. The "L" series is for power optimization. Power optimization is critical in many enterprise environments. 95W vs 50W
http://ark.intel.com/products/42931?wapkw=x3460 http://ark.intel.com/products/33090/...333-MHz-FSB%29 Last edited by jdeb; 02-21-2012 at 05:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Stereo junkie
|
Get em on eBay, the LGA771 variants are literally 10% of what they cost retail. Granted, its dead-end technology, but you get a majority of the performance of a 1366 system for 25% the cost. I have a little over $200 into my new server hardware after shipping. $50 for 2x Xeon L5420 2.5GHz/12M/1333FSB/50W TDP, $20 for a pair of new retail LGA771 heatsinks and fans, $60 for 8GB 4x 2GB of Kingston FB DDR2 667, and $70 for a brand new Supermicro X7DWE. Retail, my board is $350 new at Amazon, memory is $200 at Newegg, and the CPUs are $350 each new retail at Amazon. Id say I made out pretty good
.EDIT: Sorry, I didnt read your post all the way through. Since this will be for a mission critical environment, go with the Harpertowns. In your environment, you need max IOPs, so the more true processing cores, memory, and faster hard drives you have, the better it will be. I apologize, I thought you were talking for home use.
__________________
Join the 1%, use Linux
Last edited by Tin; 02-21-2012 at 05:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,108
|
Thanks for the replies... It's the old "Best Bang for the Buck" issue... Sure - the better the equipment the happier everyone is... But there has to be a point where more power won't be noticed.
We currently use a cpu that is a little smaller then the #1 cpu - with a 32bit OS and 4 gigs of ram. The machines acts as both the TS and Data server and performance is fine for 20 to 35 users. We'll probably get a SAS drive for the data server... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,770
|
The #1 CPU is essentially the same thing as an i7-860.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Ride 'em Cowboy
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 9,108
|
Quote:
![]() Example: # of Processing Die Transistors - 774 million on one machine vs. 820 million on the other... A friend of a friend also mentioned that the 5410 was known to be well rounded cpu... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|