Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-25-2003, 11:52 PM   #1
The Procrastinator
 
i3OSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,653
Send a message via AIM to i3OSS
.:Maxtor:. or .:Western Digital:.

I have seen both drives with the similar deals and they look pretty much the same to me. BUT which one would be better for the 8mb cache drives?
i3OSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 12:03 AM   #2
Member (14 bit)
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,654
maxtor gets my vote
bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 12:05 AM   #3
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
 
Force Flow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
WD gets my vote. I've had 4 of them, and they have all performed quite well. They are fast and extremely quiet.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
Force Flow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 12:16 AM   #4
Member (13 bit)
 
DrZaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
Either, I've used both Maxtor and WD drives with no problems. Just stay away from IBM.
DrZaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 01:49 AM   #5
Mondsreitersmann
 
Nuclear Krusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,734
I second DrZ opinion. I have an IBM DeskStar and it's running nicely, but it's from the era when they were made by IBM. Now that they are made by another company they have changed name: they are now DeathStars.
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann.
Nuclear Krusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 03:28 AM   #6
Member (9 bit)
 
cmillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 294
Send a message via ICQ to cmillion
I vote for Maxtor cause that's what's in this PC.
cmillion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 06:34 AM   #7
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
WD, fast, quiet, nice

nothing to do with the fact i have one, none whatsoever
__________________

Antec Sonata - Abit IS7-E - P4 2.4/800 @ 3.0 - 1GB OCZ Gold DDR500 - FX5950 Ultra 256MB - Audigy 2 - WD JB 80GB - XP Pro
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 08:17 AM   #8
Member (9 bit)
 
Hot Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 413
Maxtor. I've had them in my builds and have been very happy with them.
Hot Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 10:09 AM   #9
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Both are good, but I run only Maxtors.

TwoRails
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 11:03 AM   #10
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,459
They are both equivalent quality drives, but whatever you choose, go for one with a 3 year warranty. The WD "SE" (JB) drives have a 3 year, the only Maxtors that have a 3 year are the retail boxes that specifically say 3 year on them - and the new Maxline drives that start at 250 gigs.
glc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 08:18 PM   #11
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 537
Send a message via ICQ to Bushtree Send a message via AIM to Bushtree
WD gets my vote
Bushtree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 08:22 PM   #12
Member (12 bit)
 
Redo40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 2,170
Both are good drives. I prefer WD, they have been quieter than the Maxtor's that I have used.
__________________
Roger

"Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall."
-Confucius
Redo40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 10:10 PM   #13
The Procrastinator
 
i3OSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,653
Send a message via AIM to i3OSS
WOAH, seems like a 50/50 to me. anyone one know the life expectancy on these bad boys are?
i3OSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 10:12 PM   #14
Aerospace
 
Fastfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
Spec wise the Maxtors do use ATA133 and I believe the WDs dont so that should give the Maxtors an Upper hand but that will still be unnoticable.
__________________
FastFly
Fastfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 10:21 PM   #15
The Gavel
 
LawyerRon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Upland, CA
Posts: 6,311
I tend to use WD more lately but both have given me good results; flip a coin.
__________________
"To speak ill of others is a dishonest way of praising ourselves"
LawyerRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2003, 10:48 PM   #16
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
 
Force Flow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally posted by Fastfly
Spec wise the Maxtors do use ATA133 and I believe the WDs dont so that should give the Maxtors an Upper hand but that will still be unnoticable.
The ATA133 over the ATA100 is mainly just a sales gimmick. Not much of a difference at all.
Force Flow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 03:00 AM   #17
Member (8 bit)
 
plumerjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 156
Send a message via Yahoo to plumerjr
I've got maxtors in both of my computers and haven't run into problems with either one.
plumerjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 04:26 AM   #18
Tuf
Member (12 bit)
 
Tuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,261
I think I have used everything but Maxtor over the years. I have really good luck with the JB series Western Digitals. I may be wrong but I think Maxtor's better drives are by reputation a little quieter. Either one should be a good choice.
Tuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 04:59 AM   #19
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Quote:
Originally posted by Redo40
Both are good drives. I prefer WD, they have been quieter than the Maxtor's that I have used.
I think it might be the proverbial luck of the draw, as in my experiences, Maxtors have been the more quite drives! Maybe it's the old, 'if it was made on a Monday" thing... Don't know.

TwoRails
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 05:02 AM   #20
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Quote:
Originally posted by Fastfly
Spec wise the Maxtors do use ATA133 and I believe the WDs dont so that should give the Maxtors an Upper hand but that will still be unnoticable.
I've not benched the WD / Maxtors side by side, but I have benched the Maxtor ATA 100 and ATA 133s in the same machine, and yes, the ATA 133s are faster. And, of course, the ATA 133 8MB cache's are still faster yet!

TwoRails
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 05:06 AM   #21
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Quote:
Originally posted by i3OSS
WOAH, seems like a 50/50 to me. anyone one know the life expectancy on these bad boys are?
Both makers state their MTBF, but can't remember them off hand. I've used Maxtor exclusively for at least 15 years and can say I've never "worn one out"!

When I upgrade, I put the smallest one I have around into a spare parts build or the like. My sister's machine has my old 20 giger in it (it was one of the first ones out) and it's still running like a charm.

TwoRails
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 10:32 AM   #22
Member (12 bit)
 
Redo40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 2,170
Quote:
Originally posted by TwoRails
I think it might be the proverbial luck of the draw, as in my experiences, Maxtors have been the more quite drives! Maybe it's the old, 'if it was made on a Monday" thing... Don't know.

TwoRails

Yeah, I agree with you on that one TwoRails!
Redo40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 12:29 PM   #23
Member (9 bit)
 
ammo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
are seagates any good?
ammo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 03:30 PM   #24
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 338
Maybe the fluid bearing Maxtors are quiet, but I've got a non-fluid-bearing and its a loud bugger when seeking.
whargoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 04:53 AM   #25
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Quote:
Originally posted by whargoul
Maybe the fluid bearing Maxtors are quiet, but I've got a non-fluid-bearing and its a loud bugger when seeking.
JUst curious, whargoul, but how old is it?? Is the noise present only when it's working hard? What type of noise is it??
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 06:20 AM   #26
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, UK
Posts: 133
Must agree with ibm complaint. My brother had one and it gave endless hassles. he now has a WD and no problems since.
haggisinlondon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 08:44 AM   #27
Member (13 bit)
 
Confused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Mt Washington, KY
Posts: 4,927
Cool

Between those two, price and availability would be deciding factor.
Chas
__________________
I may not be much, but I'm all I think about.
Confused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 09:57 AM   #28
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,459
I hear that the new Seagates are good drives, but with their recent history, it's gonna be a while before I trust them again. Also, supposedly the new IBM 120GXP drives are good, our builder is using the 40 gig 2mb cache version of that one and we haven't had a bad one yet.

I personally will stick with WD at the present time, but if I need to I would trust a Maxtor.
glc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:24 PM   #29
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 338
I bought the drive about 3 months ago, though who knows exactly how old it is since it was one with a 3 year warrenty. And yes I mean it's somewhat noisy when say loading up a game or a few programs at once. Right now sitting idle it's fine.

Last edited by whargoul; 02-28-2003 at 02:27 PM.
whargoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 05:15 PM   #30
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Hi whargoul,

Some / most Maxtors can be put into two modes: faster, but noisier, and quite but slower. You can find the utility that switches between the two at Maxor's site. If that doesn't change the noise, and you feel the noise is excessive or abnormal, Maxtor's tech support / return routine is very good, so drop them an email.

TwoRails
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0