Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Computer Hardware

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-28-2003, 02:11 AM   #1
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 687
RDRAM upgrade question.

I want to finally upgrade my existing ram. I currently use 2 sticks of 128 RDRAM and want to add 2 more sticks of it.
I have a question however. Does the new ram have to be the same speed as the ram that's already there or can I mix/match them?

My specs are in signature.
__________________
I Like Jesus
calmius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:42 AM   #2
Member (14 bit)
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,661
they must be of the same type and speed
bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 11:59 AM   #3
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Question

Is RDRAM still faster than DDR? Is Intel going to keep it, or are they phasing it out? I wonder why it never got very popular?
__________________
Greg

1- Gigabyte GA-P55A; i5-760 CPU; HSF XIGMATEK Gaia SD1283; 8 Gig Corsair XMS DDR 3 1600 Mem; HIS H577FK 1 GB Radeon 5770 VC; Linksys WRT54GL Router; SSD Intel X25-M 80 GIG; WD VelociRaptor 150 GIG; WD 6402AAEX HD; 2 LG SATA DVD Burners; PSU CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W; Win 7 64 Bit; Acer 22" LCD Monitor
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 12:40 PM   #4
Member (14 bit)
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,661
intell stopped useing it, forgot why, maybe because ddr took over
bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:06 PM   #5
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Thumbs up

Thanks bailey,
I still noticed they have some mobo's that take it, but it sure is overwhelmingly DDR. I always thought Rambus was quite a bit faster?
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:10 PM   #6
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trivandrum, India
Posts: 800
Send a message via Yahoo to pillainp
Intel is generally moving away from RDRAM for the desktop market, in favour of DDR SDRAM. However the 850x series of desktop boards is still carried. Intel now mainly uses RDRAM in the Workstation/Server market.
pillainp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:29 PM   #7
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Thanks pillainp, but why if it's faster?, because it's more expensive?
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 04:55 PM   #8
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trivandrum, India
Posts: 800
Send a message via Yahoo to pillainp
mainly cost. 'coz DDR is so much cheaper. RDRAM is not cost-effective on desktop boards. Also, it has a very high bandwidth and pretty good speeds, more suited to server and workstation applications. the newer variants of DDR provide better implementations for user desktops.
pillainp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 05:00 PM   #9
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
 
Cricket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
4 channel PC-1200 and PC-1333 RDRAM coming

Cricket
Cricket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 05:04 PM   #10
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Thanks pillainp, I thought it was faster, I guess that was the main question. Memory has a tough time keeping up now, it's too bad it didn't take off. I don't think memory technology is keeping up with the processors. If they were selling more Rambus, the price would probably come down.
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 05:06 PM   #11
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Hey Cricket we replied at the same time. Thanks for the info, you just answered my question!
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2003, 01:45 PM   #12
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
Rdram is a proprietary technology, and very few memory manufacturers want to pay the stiff licensing fees to Rambus, Inc. They would rather find better ways to make sdram. The only reason Intel kept rdram as long as they did was a lousy (from a business standpoint) agreement they made with Rambus, Inc. that's now expired. When rdram first appeared, it totally blew away the best sdram out there at the time - which was PC133 and ddr was not out yet.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2003, 09:17 AM   #13
Member (11 bit)
 
babylon5guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,250
Thumbs up

Thanks glc, that is the best answer I've got yet. I didn't know about the agreement. If you go to the Dell site they claim Rambus is the best way to go. But everyone does seem to be getting away from it. You read so many things saying Rambus is faster then something else saying DDR is just a fast. I certainly wouldn't pay all the extra money for Rambus for a small performance gain.
babylon5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2