|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (1 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
|
Dual or Single AMD's
First off, I will be going with AMD's. I feel that any hit I take in power compared to a Pentium will be worth the cost. I don't have craploads of money to spend, but I do want to get one souped up rig.
So I'm pretty sure the best DP is the Tyan K7X Pro (http://www.tyan.com/products/html/th...xpro_spec.html) But that only supports a 266 Bus, and if I recall correctly, AMD XP's now have 333. Additionally, I don't see what that's rated to speedwise. What the max speed allowed is I mean. I also know that the best SP AMd MoBo is probably NOT the Tyan Trinity KT400 Pro (http://www.tyan.com/products/html/trinitykt400.html) but it's good enough for comparision purposes. It does support the 333 Bus, but also does not list what the max processor speed supported is. Basically, I would get better performance shelling out $350 + 2($134) = $718 for the DP 2000 AMD MP's. But is it that much better than shelling out $110 + $201 = $311 for the Trinity and XP 2600? That's a big big price difference, and if I'm not going to notice the power for my my normal (heavy) mutlitasking with internet, Trillian, mIRC and E-Mail; my programming multitasking (C++, *Nix, Web Editors, FTP); AND my hardcore image processing, rendering, and video editing, I don't think I should out out that much cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 9,138
|
If you're running duals, you're going to be buying the MP chips, not the XP, and currently they only run the 266mhz bus.
A single 2500+ on a good board will easily outperform dual MP2000+'s. My single 2000+ on an MSI KT4V-L benchmarks faster than dual MP2000+'s on an IWill board, and that's with the identical hard drive, identical video card, and identical RAM. The fastest chip you can put on the Tyan is the MP2400+ (duals). I have the feeling that a single XP2600+ would be comparable in speed, at half the cost, if you match up some fast RAM with it. Save your money, and get a fast single on a good board. Also don't forget that to take advantage of duals, you need Win2k Pro, or XP Pro. Last edited by reboot; 03-27-2003 at 10:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
|
And if you want the fastest board, get a NForce2, not a Via, and throw a bucketload of ram in it instead of spending the money on a dualie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
|
I did a dually AMD, for an outfit here on campus, VIA chipset, while it was fast, we had a bugger of a time getting that thing to finally run stable.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 9,138
|
Agreed, the Asus A7N8X and two 512 sticks of PC2700 DDR (for dual channel), with the 2600+ will be one smoking fast system.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|