|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
Hey gang,
My HDD as some of you know broke down a few days ago. Since then I have been extremely paranoid that this one will break too if I don't treat it with absolute care... My question is this: Is it good to turn the computer (and thus the HDD) off at night or is it best to leave it running 24/7? IBM warns that 24/7 usage of the Deskstar drive will cause problems, I also heard that turning the HDD on and off is a bad idea due to header damage...
__________________
|AMD Athlon XP 2700+| EPoX 8RDA3+ |Sapphire Radeon 9500 modded to 9700 OCed @ 310/300 | 512 mb Kingston PC 3200 @ 333 mhz |DVD 16X|TDK CDR/RW 52X|Vantec Tornado 119 CFM on a SLK-900 | WD-80JB and WD-100JB | Sparkle Power Ltd 400 Watt |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
oh, i have a western digital 80 gb SE (downgraded from the discontinued (and broken) wd 100 gb SE)..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 27
|
Leavin the harddisk running on 24hrs a day might not cause any harm to you hard drive if you have a good colling system or hard drive fan and turning on and off your hard drive is not a very good idea from what i know
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rockin'n Rollin' All Nite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 1,318
|
This is an old argument that has raged on for years now.
I think it's more a matter of personal choice, but there are good arguments for and against. FOR: Leaving All Powered Up. Components are stressed more when you power up, more than at any other time. You have immediate access to all your system in a matter of about a second. AGAINST: You will reach the MTBF (mean time between failures) sooner as the components are in constant use. You start with a fresh boot of the OS everytime, giving you a clean slate and refreshed system. These are just some of the arguments, I am sure that many of the peeps here will have their own views. My preference, leave it on 24/7, only power down when I am going to be away for more than 24hrs.
__________________
When the wife leaves, the dog dies and they repo' the house........I'll still have my Athlon (even when the new build arrives) ------------------------------------------------ Soltek SL-75FRN-RL / 2x512Mb PNY DDR + 1x512mb Kingston Value/ 'BARTON' 2500+ / Leadtek 6600GS / Sony DVDRW DRU810/ 60Gb Maxtor (2mb cache) 7200rpm ata133/ WD 320JB on USB2 / Antec PlusView 1000AMG Metallic Gray File Server/ Antec TruePower 330W PSU / 19" WS Hanspree New York Monitor (kvm)/ Vista Ultimate NEW BUILD DONE GA-G33M-S2 / E6750 / 2x 1GB Elixir@800mhz DDR2 / 256mb 8600GTS / 500Gb Seagate 16mb cache 7200.10 sata / NEC 18x Label Flash DVD-RW sata / E-Cute Cube case with side and top windows / Thermaltake 500watt TWV ATX 2.2 / 19" WS Hanspree New York Monitor (kvm) / 4Mbs Cable soon to be 10Mbs thanks to a free upgrade from my ISP / XP Pro SP2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Mt Washington, KY
Posts: 4,927
|
I'm in the Kissfan camp on this one. My original PC that my wife now uses has been running 24/7 except when we are going to be away for a extended period of time for 4 and half years now. It has a IBM 9G drive.
Mine has been running 24/7 for 18 months now except in same case of extended absences. The only arguments I can come up with to power down is the savings on electricity and the fact you get a clean system each day. Chas
__________________
I may not be much, but I'm all I think about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,575
|
All three of my PC's run 24/7.. although upgraded many times during this time frame, they have been running that way since 1997.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
ok thanks guys, but what about in terms of the HDD wear and tear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rockin'n Rollin' All Nite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 1,318
|
Never really noticed any difference.
Usually I use Seagate or Maxtor drives and it has never been an issue, use good HD health techniques and that seems to do the trick. Have had an old seagate 1.2G running for 5 years no sweat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,766
|
I'm in the 24/7 camp, I feel that the heating/cooling and spinup/spindown cycles are more harmful than constant running.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
do you guys feel that turning a PC on and off 5 times within a five minute interval could have caused any permanent damage to a HDD? (i waited ten seconds between each reboot).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 797
|
what about sleeping your computer? how does that come into play? i turn mine on and off all the time.... maybe i should change my life style lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
I think sleeping the PC is turning the HDD off, so that would be the same wear and tear on your HDD as if you were rebooting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
|
Found the following answer in Western Digital's knowledge base. Still makes it a personal choice, seems to me.
Question Should I turn off the computer system or leave it on when I am not using it? Answer The initial power-on process is generally harder on the internal components of a drive than spinning for extended periods. However, Western Digital drives are designed to handle either scenario. Most users outgrow their drive before repeated turning on and off becomes a problem. Turning on the drive a few times per day is considered normal usage and should not pose any problems. If a drive is turned on and off excessively on a daily basis, this could affect its longevity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
Thats the answer I was looking for, thanks Panama Red (and eveyone else)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,700
|
I've always switched my PC off at night and the old Seagate HDs in my P2450 (which I took from my P200) are still running fine.
Although I probably agree that switching it on and off once a day produces more wear and tear - I just like powering everything off at night and be damned. Different strokes for different folks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
UT2004 CHAMP!!!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Searching...
Posts: 1,001
|
So if i leave my pc on all day becuase I use it at different hours the hardware will last longer and is better than turning thw power on all the time... is this correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,766
|
If you want to turn the PC off at night, in my opinion the best thing to do is once you boot it up in the morning, leave it on till you are done with it and are going to bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
UT2004 CHAMP!!!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Searching...
Posts: 1,001
|
Alright thanks.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|