|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 797
|
cache to a different drive?
i heard you could cache or page file to a seperate hdd and it would improve performance, is this true? if so how do you get it setup? thanx
__________________
Those who realize the Self are always satisfied. Having found the source of joy and fulfillment they no longer seek happiness from the external world. They have nothing to gain or lose by any action; neither people nor things can affect their security ______________________________________________ Sys Spex: Intel C2D E6850 3GHz 1333MHzFSB @ 3.61GHz 1600MHzFSB (x9 multi, 400MHz bus, 1.4v, 35C Full Load) | Thermalright Ultra120 Extreme w/ Thermaltake 120mm | Asus P5K Deluxe/Wi-Fi | eVGA 8800GTX 768MB (Core 576MHz, Mem 900MHz @ Core 610.55MHz, Mem 1000.27MHz, 75C Full Load) | Azenx Blitzstorm Slot Fan | LITE-ON 20X DVD Burner with LightScribe Black SATA | Plextor PX-760A DVD Burner | Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3500630AS 500GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive | Maxtor 250GB ATA HDD | Corsair 620HX PSU | mushkin Extreme Performance 2GB (2 x 1GB) DDR2 1066 (PC2 8500) | Creative Sound Blaster Fatal1ty | RAIDMAX SMILODON Mid Tower | and of coarse my trusty Samsung floppy drive
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,789
|
Are you referring to the windows swap file? If so, I have heard of people putting that on a separate drive. I think the idea was that it won't get as fragmented over time. I could be wrong though, and please someone correct me if I am. HTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
|
It's an optimizing tweak that works in XP and 2000. Here's a link to the MS explanation on the how and why. I use it and it works great for me. Others have disputed the effectiveness, but their opinions seem theory based. I tried running my 1Gb of memory system with page file set to "none", but experienced some strange program faults.
http://support.microsoft.com/default...&Product=winxp
__________________
Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
I use Win2000 - and I created a fixed size pagefile on the boot partition, using the recommended size for both minimum and maximum. I then used Diskeeper Pro's boot time defragmenter to defragment it once. Zero maintenance pagefile, it will never fragment again becuse it never changes size. With 768mb ram, the recommended size was 1150mb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Got Privilege?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: IA go Hawks
Posts: 1,257
|
Im not sure how much performance is gained by the various ways to do this.
I do it like Linux: make a partition 700mg or so for the swap file first (fast part of drive) Make another about 1.5 for the OS and a few applications that I need to run fast as possible (AV, photo shop ect...) Another bigger 10 gig or so for applications like games another bigun for data files its the fastest configuration I have tried and I used to mess with this stuff in my sleep. This is a win 98SE / Mandrake 8.1 all fat 32. that might also be why this works. note separate drives for the win and Linux
__________________
P4 2.8E | 1.5GB ddr400 VR dual channel | Sony CD-R/RW | Windows XP | ATI X1950pro | Viewsonic P95F | Intel D865PERLX | WD 36g Raptor | MCHSI 3mb Cable "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973) "Absence of proof is not proof of absence." William Cowper (1731 - 1800) Wisdom Speaks: Have in your mind that which would constitute a miracle for you. Get the vision. Suspend disbelief and skepticism. Allow yourself to take the journey toward real magic. Last edited by fudtone; 11-13-2003 at 12:08 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|