|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 14
|
HDD choice question
1st time builder here with a quick question:
Ordered ALL parts but the HDD (well, paid for a 120g SATA that was not in stock so money refunded). Plan to use PC for gaming, web surfing use, NO overclocking, probably no video editing. I am getting a nice mobo, Athlon 64 cpu, lots of ram, do I need a SATA HDD? Or will IDE do for me? I do not plan to get a 2nd HDD, in fact I would say that is very very unlikely, as 120gb will be much more than I really need. IDE would save me cash AND having to learn how to install the SATA drivers! Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
No, I don't sell tires...
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 330
|
If it were me, I would go ahead and go with sata, even if I was not going to add a second drive or create a raid array. I have not tried running just on sata drive yet, but from what I have heard, there is a goo performance increase.
tireman
__________________
Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe - AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ - EVGA 7600GT X 2 - 2 GB Corsair XMS PC6400 - Antec Neo HE500 - Coolermaster Ammo 533 - Vista Home Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vanderbilt University
Posts: 230
|
you shouldnt need the drivers with a good mobo
so get SATA |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
|
Installing the SATA drivers isn't hard...
During the Windows XP install it will tell you to press F6 to install third party storage drivers. You just push F6, feed it the floppy, and it'll do its thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
Agreed, SATA is the way to go. And as Jackal said, installing the drivers is pretty simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,124
|
i dont think (if u have a 7200 rpm drive) there will be much performance increase with SATA..
i think which is best for you depends on what u want it for.. SATA i guess it will be 'future compatibile', whereas u could use ata on any old machine.. if u find no difference then i guess SATA is better just for its neater cabling, but i wouldn't go out of my way to get it right now... my fav drive is the seagate st3120026A, because it is the quietest u can get.. its not SATA, but if the SATA equivilant was as quiet (which it is not) then i would probably get that. i think IDE would 'do' as theres not *much* difference, and they are usually cheaper, but ideally SATA is best |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
The biggest difference is not necessarily the rotational speed, but the transfer speed. PATA maxes out at 100-133MB/s (but I think Maxtor is the only HD maker that uses 133). Whereas SATA is capable of 150MB/s, and the potential for increased speed is huge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
The only thing to remember with SATA drives is the increased transfer speed is that it is only the bus's potential It doesn't actually mean that it will operate any faster. The IDE drives haven't even used all of their potential yet!
If I were you I would save the money and put it towards a program like alcohol 120% so you can run your games off your hard drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
USA Pride
|
Quote:
__________________
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|