|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
04-04-2004, 12:53 AM
|
#1 |
|
Tweak Monster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,959
 |
mobile vs mobile
I was checking at the EGG and seen a 2200 mobile cpu the rates it's speed the same as the 2500 mobile 1.8ghz...same fsb only diff is the 2200 has only 256 cache...
would the 2200 mobile overclock as well as the 2500? the 2200 is only 62$ compared to the 2500's 97$.....Terry
__________________
MSI 890GXM-G65 mATX/1075t/G-Skill DDR3-1600 2x4gb /WD 640 aaks 95mb/s /XFX 5830/Zalman9700nt/ Thermaltake TP750w modular ECS P55 Black Edition/i7-860/Geil Black Dragon 2x2gb 12800-ddr3/Asus 5970X2 vid card/2x640 AALS-Raid-0/Corsair TX-850w Last edited by MaxRat; 04-04-2004 at 10:58 AM. |
|
|
|
04-04-2004, 01:33 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 113
|
I am not sure if it would overclock as well. I do know the 512 mb cache does mach a difference. AS far as the ocing part goes, my 2500 mobile is oced to 2.477ghz on a dfi board. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2004, 02:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: las vegas
Posts: 875
|
each chip is different.there are no guantee's.the bigger cache would help.got my 2500m as high as 2.64 but wasn't stable enough, yet.
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2004, 02:34 PM
|
#4 |
|
iTroll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 818
Posts: 2,252
|
Have you tried looking at the 2400+ mobiles? they are a lot cheaper and can be oced as much as the 2500+. the 512k cache makes a big difference in many apps so im sure you will want one with that big of a cache size.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
