|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
04-14-2004, 12:03 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
  |
Amd 2500 @ 4200+ :-) Wow
check this out, my friend just send me this. He has overclocked his 2500+ to 4200
 200FSB at 20.5X multiplier. this is crazy i mean crazy dont believe me look at this  http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/682/OMFG1.jpg
__________________
AMD 2500+ Barton @ Last edited by glc; 04-15-2004 at 11:17 AM. |
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:06 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,798
|
200x12.5 is only 2.5ghz...someone aint telling the truth
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:08 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:12 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,798
|
Then he should be at 4.10ghz, sorry but i find this very hard to belive unless he is running some kind of extreme setup. If i am wrong well, then sorry. But its fairly easy to take a screen shot then change the #'s with photo shop, can he take a pic of his bios with a camera showing this? And if he actually did this, then wow....
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:12 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,060
|
is that a 2500 regular or mobile?
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:12 AM
|
#6 |
|
The Procrastinator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,653
|
its not recommended to raise your multiplier that high...
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:14 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:19 AM
|
#8 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
Wow
!!! Now that is on overclock.I'd stay away from that box though, might blow up  .
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:23 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
HOLY **** LOOK WHAT HE DID NOW . i am gona die
I DONT THINK THAT POSSIBLE 68 degreess and stable http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/262/crazy.JPG i am getting scared Last edited by glc; 04-15-2004 at 11:18 AM. |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:23 AM
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
What's cooling it? Air?
__________________
*The command line, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age* |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:24 AM
|
#11 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
air
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:26 AM
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Bull.... smells kind of crappy to me.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:26 AM
|
#13 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,798
|
The highest ever done was around 5ghz with liquid nitrogen to cool it and had heavy mods had to be done to the board and what not...im betting this is a photoshop cause its damn near impossible.
Edit: there is no way possible this is done on air cooling, cant even get it done on water 
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:31 AM
|
#14 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
hmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:35 AM
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Look at the voltage!
Checkmate... |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:36 AM
|
#16 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sactown
Posts: 74
|
lol thats photoshopped. come on people, even if you are newbies to overclocking, anyone can tell those numbers are fake....just look at the style of the numbers and compare it with the serial numbers or anything else.
if youre gonna flaunt something at least tell your friend he needs to keep tabs on consistency. haha. |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:37 AM
|
#17 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,798
|
Just was about to say that dragon, no way that thing is running like that on stock voltage....sorry but your friend is nothing but a cheat.
Edit: Another great poing mike, if you look the 6's are curved in the serial while there slanted in the proc speed. Last edited by FLG; 04-14-2004 at 12:40 AM. |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:38 AM
|
#18 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 215
|
god damm him...i believed him
ohh well, i guess it may be possible in the fucture |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:40 AM
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
LoL... anything is possible in the future. But that kind of speed is not possible now, with that chip, with those settings.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:41 AM
|
#20 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
Yep, look at the difference between the clock speed numbers in the left pic, compared to the other text. Total bull.
Plus, it's XP Media Center Edition, which means that it came on a pre-built system (ie Dell), and cannot be overclocked, unless he did some upgrading of the MB, RAM, etc.. |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:52 AM
|
#21 |
|
Member (2 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
|
ahha tiz me!
 ph33r me... ok u guys r right and wrong... i did not use Photoshop and it is a insult to even say i did... i also dont have a pre built system.. i make my own pcs.. http://gamerspec.orcon.net.nz if u want proof. |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:52 AM
|
#22 |
|
Member (2 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
|
i used paint ffs
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 08:56 AM
|
#23 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,124
|
if u look at the 6 on the 2nd one, it doesn't even look like the other 6's.. (same with the other changed numbers)
but 4200 speeds (and beyond) have been achieved on mobile 2500s but 4200 is around 2.9ghz, not 4.07 really suprized it lasted so long before someone called bull on this! would have thought you guys would have realised 4.07ghz isn't 4200.. and it wouldn't even be detected as a 4200 anyway would it? |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 09:59 AM
|
#24 |
|
Resident Intel Fanboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,669
|
I would think the computer would still *see* the chip as a 2500....mine still says I have a p4 2.8GHz proc....just reports the clock speed as different. Although I've never really paid attention to the computer properties screen there, only one's I look at are AIDA32 and SANDRA....
__________________
...wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat... |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:03 PM
|
#25 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The 'Frozen' North
Posts: 297
|
Good try though - I wonder how many people just scrambled out to snatch up some 2500's.
__________________
Intel Q6600 Quad Core Asus P5K-E EVGA nVidia 8800GS 2 x 2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 Samsung 1TB HD103SJ Antec Twinpower Trio 650W Windows 7 / Ubuntu 10.10 |
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:30 PM
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Well, it's still a good chip... just not that good.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 12:45 PM
|
#27 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 110
|
May help if he photoshoped it with the correct font LOL look at the 2 its completly different to what the other 2's look like
|
|
|
|
04-14-2004, 01:48 PM
|
#28 |
|
iTroll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 818
Posts: 2,252
|
OMG THATS ALMOST AS INSANE AS THE DOWNLOAD SPEED I GOT WHEN I HAD 56K!!! I have cable now btw.
http://img20.photobucket.com/albums/...stdownload.bmp *edit* Sorry its hard to see but it says it was going at 10000000MB/Sec. Hey stop trying to pull off BS like this, its not kool and it just gives you a bad name. If you even overclocked it 1Mhz then congrats for your successful overclock but dont try and pull shizle off like that. Last edited by glc; 04-15-2004 at 11:23 AM. |
|
|
|
04-15-2004, 11:21 AM
|
#29 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,453
|
I'm closing this thread, it's going nowhere productive and is far from respectful. I also converted the huge inline images to links, when I get a horizontal scroll bar at 1280x1024, that's just not considerate.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
