Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > Archives > Contemporary Terrorism

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-25-2001, 11:55 PM   #1
Member (7 bit)
 
KParker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 121
We, The People

Not everyone may agree with this viewpoint, but if you are going to be on a plane any time soon, it's something to think about.

=======================

Aboard Flight 564
Peter Hannaford

As it was at most U.S. airports, last Saturday was the first near-normal day
at Denver International since the terrorist attacks. On United's Flight 564
the door had just been locked and the plane was about to pull out of the
gate when the captain came on the public address system.

"I want to thank you brave folks for coming out today. We don't have any new
instructions from the federal government, so from now on we're on our own."

The passengers listened in total silence.
He explained that airport security measures had pretty much solved the
problem of firearms being carried aboard, but not weapons of the type the
terrorists apparently used, plastic knives or those fashioned from wood or
ceramics.

"Sometimes a potential hijacker will announce that he has a bomb. There are
no bombs on this aircraft and if someone were to get up and make that claim,
don't believe him.

"If someone were to stand up,brandish something such as a plastic knife and
say 'This is a hijacking' or words to that effect here is what you should
do: Every one of you should stand up and immediately throw things at that
person - pillows, books, magazines, eyeglasses, shoes -anything that will
throw him off balance and distract his attention. If he has a confederate or
two, do the same with them. Most important: get a blanket over him, then
wrestle him to floor and keep him there. We'll land the plane at the nearest
airport and the authorities will take it from there."

"Remember, there will be one of him and maybe a few confederates, but there
are 200 of you. You can overwhelm them.
"The Declaration of Independence says 'We, the people' and that's just what
it is when we're up in the air: we, the people, vs. would-be terrorists. I
don't think we are going to have any such problem today or tomorrow or for a
while, but some time down the road, it is going to happen again and I want
you to know what to do.

"Now, since we're a family for the new few hours, I'll ask you to turn to
the person next to you, introduce yourself, tell them a little about
yourself and ask them to do the same."

The end of this remarkable speech brought sustained clapping from the
passengers. He had put the matter in perspective. If only the passengers on
those ill-fated flights last Tuesday had been given the same talk, I
thought, they might be alive today. One group on United Flight 93, which
crashed in a Pennsylvania field, apparently rushed the hijackers in an
attempt to wrest control from them. While they perished, they succeeded in
preventing the terrorist from attacking his intended goal, possibly the
White House or the Capitol.

Procedures for dealing with hijackers were conceived in a time when the
hijackers were usually seeking the release of jailed comrades or a large
amount of money. Mass murder was not their goal. That short talk last
Saturday by the pilot of Flight 564 should set a new standard of realism.

Every passenger should learn the simple - but potentially life-saving -
procedure he outlined. He showed his passengers that a hijacking does not
have to result in hopelessness and terror, but victory over the
perpetrators.

The Airline Pilots Association, the pilots' union, last week dropped its
opposition to stronger cockpit doors and is now calling for retrofits. (It's
opposition was based on pilot concerns about getting out easily in emergency
situations.) The scandal of easily penetrated airport security will result
in congressional calls for a federal takeover of the security system.

Previous efforts to reform security procedures and raise standards have been
talked to death. This time, however, no lobbying efforts must be allowed to
prevent airport security from getting the reforms that are needed: federal
operation, rigorous training, decent pay and no foreign nationals eligible
for employment.

Peter Hannaford is a public affairs consultant.
KParker is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1